<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T10:12:29.439503+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-309234</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-309234</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:12:29.488876+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-309234</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-309234"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-41583</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-41583</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:12:29.488918+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.1 and prior to zebra-script version 5.0.2, after a refactoring, Zebra failed to validate a consensus rule that restricted the possible values of sighash hash types for V5 transactions which were enabled in the NU5 network upgrade. Zebra nodes could thus accept and eventually mine a block that would be considered invalid by zcashd nodes, creating a consensus split between Zebra and zcashd nodes. In a similar vein, for V4 transactions, Zebra mistakenly used the "canonical" hash type when computing the sighash while zcashd (correctly per the spec) uses the raw value, which could also crate a consensus split. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-script version 5.0.2.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-41583"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8m29-fpq5-89jj</id>
    <title>GHSA-8m29-fpq5-89jj — Zebra Vulnerable to Consensus Divergence in Transparent Sighash Hash-Type Handling</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:12:29.488958+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> crates.io: zebrad, crates.io: zebra-script</p>
<p># CVE-2026-41583: Consensus Divergence in Transparent Sighash Hash-Type Handling</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>After a refactoring, Zebra failed to validate a consensus rule that restricted the possible values of sighash hash types for V5 transactions which were enabled in the NU5 network upgrade. Zebra nodes could thus accept and eventually mine a block that would be considered invalid by zcashd nodes, creating a consensus split between Zebra and zcashd nodes.</p>
<p>In a similar vein, for V4 transactions, Zebra mistakenly used the "canonical" hash type when computing the sighash while zcashd (correctly per the spec) uses the raw value, which could also crate a consensus split.</p>
<p>## Severity</p>
<p>**Critical** - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious party to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.</p>
<p>Note that the impact is currently alleviated by the fact that currently most miners run `zcashd`.</p>
<p>## Affected Versions</p>
<p>All Zebra versions prior to version 4.3.1. (Some older versions are not impacted but are no longer supported by the network.)</p>
<p>## Description</p>
<p>Verification of transparent transactions inherits the Bitcoin Script verification code in C++. Since it is consensus-critical, this code was called from Zebra through foreign function interface (FFI). That interface was clunky because it required parsing the whole transaction in C++ code, which would then pull Rust libraries which could get in conflict with…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8m29-fpq5-89jj"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
