<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T09:25:39.089460+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-293232</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-293232</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:25:39.185669+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-293232</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-293232"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-41166</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-41166</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:25:39.185748+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>OpenRemote is an open-source internet-of-things platform. Prior to version 1.22.1, a user who has `write:admin` in one Keycloak realm can call the Manager API to update Keycloak realm roles for users in another realm, including `master`. The handler uses the `{realm}` path segment when talking to the identity provider but does not check that the caller may administer that realm. This could result in a privilege escalation to `master` realm administrator if the attacker controls any user in `master` realm. Version 1.22.1 fixes the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-41166"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-49vv-25qx-mg44</id>
    <title>GHSA-49vv-25qx-mg44 — OpenRemote has Improper Access Control via updateUserRealmRoles function</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:25:39.185784+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: io.openremote:openremote-manager</p>
<p>### Summary
A user who has `write:admin` in one Keycloak realm can call the Manager API to update **Keycloak realm roles** for users in **another** realm, including **`master`**. The handler uses the `{realm}` path segment when talking to the identity provider but does not check that the caller may administer that realm. This could result in a privilege escalation to `master` realm administrator if the attacker controls any user in `master` realm.</p>
<p>### Details
In `manager/src/main/java/org/openremote/manager/security/UserResourceImpl.java`, there is no check to validate if the caller should be able to administer a realm they're trying to update.</p>
<p>```340:353:manager/src/main/java/org/openremote/manager/security/UserResourceImpl.java
    @Override
    public void updateUserRealmRoles(RequestParams requestParams, String realm, String userId, String[] roles) {
        try {
            identityService.getIdentityProvider().updateUserRealmRoles(
                realm,
                userId,
                roles);
        } catch (ClientErrorException ex) {
            ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
            throw new WebApplicationException(ex.getCause(), ex.getResponse().getStatus());
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            throw new WebApplicationException(ex);
        }
    }
```</p>
<p>### PoC
1. Create a **new** Keycloak realm other than `master`. Add a user and grant that user the OpenRemote client role `write:admin`. Remember the realm name (call it `NEW_REALM`).
2. I…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-49vv-25qx-mg44"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
