<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-07T06:04:48.672152+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-359564</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-359564</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T06:04:48.718707+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-359564</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-359564"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-35445</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-35445</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T06:04:48.718747+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Winter CMS is a content management system built on the Laravel PHP framework. In versions prior to 1.2.13, the backend did not validate the handler name submitted through the form postback _handler POST field, allowing an authenticated backend user to invoke arbitrary controller methods, including protected, private, and action-prefixed ones. While AJAX requests validate that handler names match the on[A-Z][\w+]* pattern, the postback path passed the submitted _handler value straight to the handler dispatcher with no such check, so any controller that exposes a public action or conditionally relaxes its $requiredPermissions check could be reached, bypassing the roles and permissions system. The built-in Users controller was affected because it set $requiredPermissions to null for the myaccount action, letting any authenticated backend user invoke user-management methods such as update_onDelete and update_onManualPasswordReset without holding the backend.manage_users permission. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.13.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-35445"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j5jq-cr68-v2xx</id>
    <title>GHSA-j5jq-cr68-v2xx — Winter: Authenticated backend users can bypass Users controller permission checks</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T06:04:48.718785+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Packagist: winter/wn-backend-module</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>Affected versions of Winter CMS did not validate the handler name submitted through the form postback mechanism (`_handler` POST field) in the same way as AJAX requests (`X_WINTER_REQUEST_HANDLER` header). The AJAX path validates that handler names match the `on[A-Z][\w+]*` pattern, but the postback path passed the handler name directly to the handler dispatcher with no validation.</p>
<p>This allowed an authenticated backend user to call any method on a controller — including action-prefixed, protected, and private methods — by submitting a crafted POST request with a `_handler` field, as long as the controller either:</p>
<p>- Contains a publicly available action via the `$publicActions` property, or
- Degrades or removes the `$requiredPermissions` check in its constructor based on a condition</p>
<p>The backend's own Users controller was affected by the second scenario: it set `$requiredPermissions` to `null` for the `myaccount` action, allowing any authenticated backend user to access the controller without the `backend.manage_users` permission. Combined with the postback bypass, this allowed calling controller methods such as `update_onDelete`, `update_onRestore`, `update_onUnsuspendUser`, and `update_onManualPasswordReset` with attacker-controlled parameters.</p>
<p>Note that CSRF tokens are still verified on all POST requests, so the attacker must be logged into the backend with a valid session.</p>
<p>To actively exploit this security issue, an attacker would need access to the Backen…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j5jq-cr68-v2xx"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
