<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T11:44:49.297599+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-268685</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-268685</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:44:49.345562+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-268685</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-268685"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-2439</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-2439</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:44:49.345616+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Concierge::Sessions versions from 0.8.1 before 0.8.5 for Perl generate insecure session ids. The generate_session_id function in Concierge::Sessions::Base defaults to using the uuidgen command to generate a UUID, with a fallback to using Perl's built-in rand function. Neither of these methods are secure, and attackers are able to guess session_ids that can grant them access to systems. Specifically,</p>
<p>*  There is no warning when uuidgen fails. The software can be quietly using the fallback rand() function with no warnings if the command fails for any reason.
  *  The uuidgen command will generate a time-based UUID if the system does not have a high-quality random number source, because the call does not explicitly specify the --random option. Note that the system time is shared in HTTP responses.
  *  UUIDs are identifiers whose mere possession grants access, as per RFC 9562.
  *  The output of the built-in rand() function is predictable and unsuitable for security applications.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-2439"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9gww-cr64-679c</id>
    <title>GHSA-9gww-cr64-679c</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:44:49.345690+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Concierge::Sessions versions from 0.8.1 before 0.8.5 for Perl generate insecure session ids. The generate_session_id function in Concierge::Sessions::Base defaults to using the uuidgen command to generate a UUID, with a fallback to using Perl's built-in rand function. Neither of these methods are secure, and attackers are able to guess session_ids that can grant them access to systems. Specifically,</p>
<p>*  There is no warning when uuidgen fails. The software can be quietly using the fallback rand() function with no warnings if the command fails for any reason.
  *  The uuidgen command will generate a time-based UUID if the system does not have a high-quality random number source, because the call does not explicitly specify the --random option. Note that the system time is shared in HTTP responses.
  *  UUIDs are identifiers whose mere possession grants access, as per RFC 9562.
  *  The output of the built-in rand() function is predictable and unsuitable for security applications.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9gww-cr64-679c"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
