<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-09T18:23:22.090724+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-373394</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-373394</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T18:23:22.092935+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-373394</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-373394"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-48044</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-48044</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T18:23:22.092971+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows Authentication Bypass.</p>
<p>This issue affects ash: from 3.6.3 before 3.7.1.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-48044"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pcxq-fjp3-r752</id>
    <title>GHSA-pcxq-fjp3-r752 — Ash has authorization bypass when bypass policy condition evaluates to true</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T18:23:22.093003+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Hex: ash</p>
<p>### Summary
Bypass policies incorrectly authorize requests when their condition evaluates to true but their authorization checks fail and no other policies apply.</p>
<p>### Impact
Resources with bypass policies can be accessed without proper authorization when:
- Bypass condition evaluates to true
- Bypass authorization checks fail
- Other policies exist but their conditions don't match</p>
<p>### Details
Vulnerable code in: [lib/ash/policy/policy.ex:69](https://github.com/ash-project/ash/blob/b2e4d625/lib/ash/policy/policy.ex#L69)</p>
<p>```elixir
{%{bypass?: true}, cond_expr, complete_expr}, {one_condition_matches, all_policies_match} -&gt;
  {
    b(cond_expr or one_condition_matches),  # &lt;- Bug: uses condition only
    b(complete_expr or all_policies_match)
  }
```</p>
<p>The final authorization decision is: `one_condition_matches AND all_policies_match`</p>
<p>When a bypass condition is true but bypass policies fail, and subsequent policies have non-matching conditions:</p>
<p>1. **one_condition_matches** = `cond_expr` (bypass condition) = **true** (bug - should check if bypass actually authorizes)
2. **all_policies_match** = `(complete_expr OR NOT cond_expr)` for each policy
   - For non-matching policies: `(false OR NOT false)` = **true** (policies don't apply)
3. **Final**: `true AND true` = **true** (incorrectly authorized)</p>
<p>The bypass condition alone satisfies "at least one policy applies" even though the bypass fails to authorize.</p>
<p>### Fix
Replace `cond_expr` with `complete_expr` on line 69:
```elixir…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pcxq-fjp3-r752"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
