<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.397042+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-232763</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-232763</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.400062+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-232763</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-232763"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-24845</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2022-24845</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.400097+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-24845"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j2x6-9323-fp7h</id>
    <title>GHSA-j2x6-9323-fp7h — Integer bounds error in Vyper</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.400130+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: vyper</p>
<p>### Impact
in the following code, the return of `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. as of v0.3.0, `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions.
```vyper
interface iface:
    def returns_int128() -&gt; int128: view
    def returns_Bytes33() -&gt; Bytes[33]: view</p>
<p>x: iface
 
@external
def call_out():
    x: int128 = self.x.returns_int128()  # affected, &lt;0.3.0
    y: uint256 = convert(self.x.returns_int128(), uint256)  # affected, &lt;0.3.2
    z: Bytes[33] = concat(self.x.returns_Bytes33(), b"")  # affected &gt;= 0.3.0, &lt;0.3.2
```</p>
<p>### Patches
0.3.2 (as of https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/049dbdc647b2ce838fae7c188e6bb09cf16e470b)</p>
<p>### Workarounds
Break up operations involving external calls into multiple statements. For instance, instead of the example above, use
```
x: int128 = self.x.returns_int128()
y: uint256 = convert(x, uint256)
```</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-j2x6-9323-fp7h"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-24845</id>
    <title>gsd-2022-24845</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.400164+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2022-24845</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-24845"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-198</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2022-198</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T08:43:32.400178+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: vyper</p>
<p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `&lt;iface&gt;.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-198"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
