<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.676566+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-234393</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-234393</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.680227+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-234393</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-234393"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-24719</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2022-24719</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.680259+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Fluture-Node is a FP-style HTTP and streaming utils for Node based on Fluture. Using `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` with any of the redirection strategies built into fluture-node 4.0.0 or 4.0.1, paired with a request that includes confidential headers such as Authorization or Cookie, exposes you to a vulnerability where, if the destination server were to redirect the request to a server on a third-party domain, or the same domain over unencrypted HTTP, the headers would be included in the follow-up request and be exposed to the third party, or potential http traffic sniffing. The redirection strategies made available in version 4.0.2 automatically redact confidential headers when a redirect is followed across to another origin. A workaround has been identified by using a custom redirection strategy via the `followRedirectsWith` function. The custom strategy can be based on the new strategies available in fluture-node@4.0.2.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-24719"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-32x6-qvw6-mxj4</id>
    <title>GHSA-32x6-qvw6-mxj4 — Forwarding of confidentials headers to third parties in fluture-node</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.680294+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: fluture-node</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>Using `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` with any of the redirection strategies built into fluture-node 4.0.0 or 4.0.1, paired with a request that includes confidential headers such as Authorization or Cookie, exposes you to a vulnerability where, if the destination server were to redirect the request to a server on a third-party domain, or the same domain over unencrypted HTTP, the headers would be included in the follow-up request and be exposed to the third party, or potential http traffic sniffing.</p>
<p>### Patches</p>
<p>The redirection strategies made available in version 4.0.2 automatically redact confidential headers when a redirect is followed across to another origin.</p>
<p>### Workarounds</p>
<p>Use a custom redirection strategy via the `followRedirectsWith` function. The custom strategy can be based on the new strategies available in fluture-node@4.0.2.</p>
<p>### References</p>
<p>- This vulnerability was discovered after the announcement of similar vulnerabilities in the `follow-redirects` package. There is more information there: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-74fj-2j2h-c42q and https://huntr.dev/bounties/7cf2bf90-52da-4d59-8028-a73b132de0db/
- Fixed in 125e4474f910c1507f8ec3232848626fbc0f55c4 and 0c99bc511533d48be17dc6bfe641f7d0aeb34d77</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-32x6-qvw6-mxj4"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-24719</id>
    <title>gsd-2022-24719</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.680328+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2022-24719</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-24719"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-43051</id>
    <title>Withdrawn: PYSEC-2022-43051</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T09:51:18.680341+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: pyquest</p>
<p>Fluture-Node is a FP-style HTTP and streaming utils for Node based on Fluture. Using `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` with any of the redirection strategies built into fluture-node 4.0.0 or 4.0.1, paired with a request that includes confidential headers such as Authorization or Cookie, exposes you to a vulnerability where, if the destination server were to redirect the request to a server on a third-party domain, or the same domain over unencrypted HTTP, the headers would be included in the follow-up request and be exposed to the third party, or potential http traffic sniffing. The redirection strategies made available in version 4.0.2 automatically redact confidential headers when a redirect is followed across to another origin. A workaround has been identified by using a custom redirection strategy via the `followRedirectsWith` function. The custom strategy can be based on the new strategies available in fluture-node@4.0.2.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2022-43051"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
