<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.596663+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-44630</id>
    <title>cnvd-2020-44630</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828311+00:00</updated>
    <content>cnvd-2020-44630</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2020-44630"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-42666</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-42666</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828357+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-42666</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-42666"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-15134</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2020-15134</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828380+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Faye before version 1.4.0, there is a lack of certification validation in TLS handshakes. Faye uses em-http-request and faye-websocket in the Ruby version of its client. Those libraries both use the `EM::Connection#start_tls` method in EventMachine to implement the TLS handshake whenever a `wss:` URL is used for the connection. This method does not implement certificate verification by default, meaning that it does not check that the server presents a valid and trusted TLS certificate for the expected hostname. That means that any `https:` or `wss:` connection made using these libraries is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, since it does not confirm the identity of the server it is connected to. The first request a Faye client makes is always sent via normal HTTP, but later messages may be sent via WebSocket. Therefore it is vulnerable to the same problem that these underlying libraries are, and we needed both libraries to support TLS verification before Faye could claim to do the same. Your client would still be insecure if its initial HTTPS request was verified, but later WebSocket connections were not. This is fixed in Faye v1.4.0, which enables verification by default. For further background information on this issue, please see the referenced GitHub Advisory.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2020-15134"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3q49-h8f9-9fr9</id>
    <title>GHSA-3q49-h8f9-9fr9 — Missing TLS certificate verification</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828431+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> RubyGems: faye</p>
<p>Faye uses [em-http-request][6] and [faye-websocket][10] in the Ruby version of its client. Those libraries both use the [`EM::Connection#start_tls`][1] method in [EventMachine][2] to implement the TLS handshake whenever a `wss:` URL is used for the connection. This method does not implement certificate verification by default, meaning that it does not check that the server presents a valid and trusted TLS certificate for the expected hostname. That means that any `https:` or `wss:` connection made using these libraries is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, since it does not confirm the identity of the server it is connected to.</p>
<p>The first request a Faye client makes is always sent via normal HTTP, but later messages may be sent via WebSocket. Therefore it is vulnerable to the same problem that these underlying libraries are, and we needed both libraries to support TLS verification before Faye could claim to do the same. Your client would still be insecure if its initial HTTPS request was verified, but later WebSocket connections were not.</p>
<p>This has been a requested feature in EventMachine for many years now; see for example [#275][3], [#378][4], and [#814][5]. In June 2020, em-http-request published an [advisory][7] related to this problem and fixed it by [implementing TLS verification][8] in their own codebase; although EventMachine does not implement certificate verification itself, it provides an extension point for
the caller to implement it, called [`ssl_verify_p…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3q49-h8f9-9fr9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-15134</id>
    <title>gsd-2020-15134</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828509+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2020-15134</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2020-15134"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2020-15134</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2020-15134</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T23:44:04.828533+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: ruby-faye, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: ruby-faye, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: ruby-faye</p>
<p>Faye before version 1.4.0, there is a lack of certification validation in TLS handshakes. Faye uses em-http-request and faye-websocket in the Ruby version of its client. Those libraries both use the `EM::Connection#start_tls` method in EventMachine to implement the TLS handshake whenever a `wss:` URL is used for the connection. This method does not implement certificate verification by default, meaning that it does not check that the server presents a valid and trusted TLS certificate for the expected hostname. That means that any `https:` or `wss:` connection made using these libraries is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, since it does not confirm the identity of the server it is connected to. The first request a Faye client makes is always sent via normal HTTP, but later messages may be sent via WebSocket. Therefore it is vulnerable to the same problem that these underlying libraries are, and we needed both libraries to support TLS verification before Faye could claim to do the same. Your client would still be insecure if its initial HTTPS request was verified, but later WebSocket connections were not. This is fixed in Faye v1.4.0, which enables verification by default. For further background information on this issue, please see the referenced GitHub Advisory.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2020-15134"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
