<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-20T19:17:36.720293+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-164329</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-164329</title>
    <updated>2026-10-20T19:17:36.727265+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-164329</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-164329"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2016-10555</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2016-10555</title>
    <updated>2026-10-20T19:17:36.727315+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decode()in jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key. This could be used to forge any data an attacker wants.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2016-10555"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgrx-w6rg-8fqf</id>
    <title>GHSA-vgrx-w6rg-8fqf — Forgeable Public/Private Tokens in jwt-simple</title>
    <updated>2026-10-20T19:17:36.727364+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: jwt-simple</p>
<p>Affected versions of the `jwt-simple` package allow users to select what algorithm the server will use to verify a provided JWT. A malicious actor can use this behaviour to arbitrarily modify the contents of a JWT while still passing verification. For the common use case of the JWT, the end result is a complete authentication bypass with minimal effort.</p>
<p>## Recommendation</p>
<p>Update to version 0.3.1 or later.</p>
<p>Additionally, be sure to always specify an algorithm in calls to `.decode()`.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgrx-w6rg-8fqf"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2016-10555</id>
    <title>gsd-2016-10555</title>
    <updated>2026-10-20T19:17:36.727416+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2016-10555</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2016-10555"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
