<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T13:35:42.766292+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-32038</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-32038 — OpenClaw - Sandbox Network Isolation Bypass via docker.network=container Parameter</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T13:35:42.769662+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> OpenClaw</p>
<p>OpenClaw before 2026.2.24 contains a sandbox network isolation bypass vulnerability that allows trusted operators to join another container's network namespace. Attackers can configure the docker.network parameter with container:&lt;id&gt; values to reach services in target container namespaces and bypass network hardening controls.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-32038"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ww6v-v748-x7g9</id>
    <title>GHSA-ww6v-v748-x7g9 — OpenClaw has a sandbox network isolation bypass via docker.network=container:&lt;id&gt;</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T13:35:42.769746+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: openclaw</p>
<p>### Summary
In `openclaw@2026.2.23`, sandbox network hardening blocks `network=host` but still allows `network=container:&lt;id&gt;`.</p>
<p>This can let a sandbox join another container's network namespace and reach services available in that namespace.</p>
<p>### Preconditions and Trust Model Context
This issue requires a trusted-operator configuration path (for example setting `agents.defaults.sandbox.docker.network` in gateway config). It is not an unauthenticated remote exploit by itself.</p>
<p>### Details
Current validation blocks only `host`, while forwarding other values to Docker create args:</p>
<p>- `validateNetworkMode(network)` only rejects values in `BLOCKED_NETWORK_MODES = {"host"}`.
- `buildSandboxCreateArgs(...)` validates then forwards `cfg.network` into `--network`.
- Browser sandbox helper also treats `container:` as an accepted mode in network preparation.</p>
<p>Effective behavior:</p>
<p>- `host` -&gt; blocked
- `container:&lt;id&gt;` -&gt; accepted and forwarded</p>
<p>### Impact
Type: sandbox network isolation hardening bypass.</p>
<p>Practical impact depends on deployment:</p>
<p>- Requires ability to influence trusted sandbox network config.
- Higher impact when a target container exposes privileged/internal network reachability.</p>
<p>### Remediation
Block namespace-join style network modes (including `container:&lt;id&gt;`) for sandbox containers, and keep strict allowlisting for safe network modes.</p>
<p>### Patch Status
Fixed on `main` in commit `14b6eea6e`:
https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/14b6eea6e</p>
<p>Follow-up refact…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-ww6v-v748-x7g9"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
