<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-09T18:06:35.302721+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-68809</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-68809 — ksmbd: vfs: fix race on m_flags in vfs_cache</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T18:06:35.303844+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ksmbd: vfs: fix race on m_flags in vfs_cache</p>
<p>ksmbd maintains delete-on-close and pending-delete state in
ksmbd_inode-&gt;m_flags. In vfs_cache.c this field is accessed under
inconsistent locking: some paths read and modify m_flags under
ci-&gt;m_lock while others do so without taking the lock at all.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<p>- ksmbd_query_inode_status() and __ksmbd_inode_close() use
   ci-&gt;m_lock when checking or updating m_flags.
 - ksmbd_inode_pending_delete(), ksmbd_set_inode_pending_delete(),
   ksmbd_clear_inode_pending_delete() and ksmbd_fd_set_delete_on_close()
   used to read and modify m_flags without ci-&gt;m_lock.</p>
<p>This creates a potential data race on m_flags when multiple threads
open, close and delete the same file concurrently. In the worst case
delete-on-close and pending-delete bits can be lost or observed in an
inconsistent state, leading to confusing delete semantics (files that
stay on disk after delete-on-close, or files that disappear while still
in use).</p>
<p>Fix it by:</p>
<p>- Making ksmbd_query_inode_status() look at m_flags under ci-&gt;m_lock
   after dropping inode_hash_lock.
 - Adding ci-&gt;m_lock protection to all helpers that read or modify
   m_flags (ksmbd_inode_pending_delete(), ksmbd_set_inode_pending_delete(),
   ksmbd_clear_inode_pending_delete(), ksmbd_fd_set_delete_on_close()).
 - Keeping the existing ci-&gt;m_lock protection in __ksmbd_inode_close(),
   and moving the actual unlink/xattr removal outside…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-68809"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
