<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T14:11:48.490732+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-50186</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-50186 — net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf-&gt;create fails</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T14:11:48.507106+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf-&gt;create fails</p>
<p>We have recently noticed the exact same KASAN splat as in commit
6cd4a78d962b ("net: do not leave a dangling sk pointer, when socket
creation fails"). The problem is that commit did not fully address the
problem, as some pf-&gt;create implementations do not use sk_common_release
in their error paths.</p>
<p>For example, we can use the same reproducer as in the above commit, but
changing ping to arping. arping uses AF_PACKET socket and if packet_create
fails, it will just sk_free the allocated sk object.</p>
<p>While we could chase all the pf-&gt;create implementations and make sure they
NULL the freed sk object on error from the socket, we can't guarantee
future protocols will not make the same mistake.</p>
<p>So it is easier to just explicitly NULL the sk pointer upon return from
pf-&gt;create in __sock_create. We do know that pf-&gt;create always releases the
allocated sk object on error, so if the pointer is not NULL, it is
definitely dangling.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-50186"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
