<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-07T12:16:05.778897+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-38589</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-38589 — netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:16:05.781127+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P, Siemens SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family, Siemens SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()</p>
<p>syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1]</p>
<p>Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node)</p>
<p>[1]
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff8880186e2070 (&amp;nr_node-&gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
 ffff8880186e2070 (&amp;nr_node-&gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline]
 ffff8880186e2070 (&amp;nr_node-&gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline]
 ffff8880186e2070 (&amp;nr_node-&gt;node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697</p>
<p>but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
 ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline]
 ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697</p>
<p>which lock already depends on the new lock.</p>
<p>the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:</p>
<p>-&gt; #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
        lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
        __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spi…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-38589"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
