<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-08T22:51:26.439103+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-31076</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-31076 — genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline</title>
    <updated>2026-10-08T22:51:26.458550+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>genirq/cpuhotplug, x86/vector: Prevent vector leak during CPU offline</p>
<p>The absence of IRQD_MOVE_PCNTXT prevents immediate effectiveness of
interrupt affinity reconfiguration via procfs. Instead, the change is
deferred until the next instance of the interrupt being triggered on the
original CPU.</p>
<p>When the interrupt next triggers on the original CPU, the new affinity is
enforced within __irq_move_irq(). A vector is allocated from the new CPU,
but the old vector on the original CPU remains and is not immediately
reclaimed. Instead, apicd-&gt;move_in_progress is flagged, and the reclaiming
process is delayed until the next trigger of the interrupt on the new CPU.</p>
<p>Upon the subsequent triggering of the interrupt on the new CPU,
irq_complete_move() adds a task to the old CPU's vector_cleanup list if it
remains online. Subsequently, the timer on the old CPU iterates over its
vector_cleanup list, reclaiming old vectors.</p>
<p>However, a rare scenario arises if the old CPU is outgoing before the
interrupt triggers again on the new CPU.</p>
<p>In that case irq_force_complete_move() is not invoked on the outgoing CPU
to reclaim the old apicd-&gt;prev_vector because the interrupt isn't currently
affine to the outgoing CPU, and irq_needs_fixup() returns false. Even
though __vector_schedule_cleanup() is later called on the new CPU, it
doesn't reclaim apicd-&gt;prev_vector; instead, it simply resets both
apicd-&gt;move_in_progress and apicd-&gt;pr…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-31076"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
