<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-09T10:37:22.587736+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-26924</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-26924 — netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element</title>
    <updated>2026-10-09T10:37:22.589965+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux, linux_kernel</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element</p>
<p>Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a
back-to-back add/remove pattern.  Quoting Pablo:</p>
<p>add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms
  ...
  add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms
  del_elem("0000000X") &lt;---------------- delete one that was just added
  ...
  add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms</p>
<p>1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X
  Then, KASAN shows a splat.</p>
<p>Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a
rule that maps to a non-deactivated element.</p>
<p>Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the
to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.
Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.</p>
<p>The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one
element that share the same key.</p>
<p>This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already
holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing
key has timed out or is not active in the next generation.</p>
<p>In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.
If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes
unreachable.</p>
<p>The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will
remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in
a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale
pointer)…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-26924"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
