<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.510207+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-thrift-2026-85088</id>
    <title>BIT-thrift-2026-85088 — Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift: The C++ and D clients fall back to the certificate Common Name when subjectAltName entrie…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516125+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: thrift</p>
<p>Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.</p>
<p>Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host</p>
<p>name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than</p>
<p>a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.</p>
<p>RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a</p>
<p>Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host</p>
<p>name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.</p>
<p>This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. User…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-thrift-2026-85088"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-382244</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-382244</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516200+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-382244</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-382244"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-85088</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-85088</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516217+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.</p>
<p>Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host</p>
<p>name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than</p>
<p>a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.</p>
<p>RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a</p>
<p>Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host</p>
<p>name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.</p>
<p>This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. User…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-85088"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4xmj-xwhr-jcj2</id>
    <title>GHSA-4xmj-xwhr-jcj2</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516258+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift.</p>
<p>Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host</p>
<p>name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than</p>
<p>a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check.</p>
<p>RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a</p>
<p>Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host</p>
<p>name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure.</p>
<p>This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. User…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4xmj-xwhr-jcj2"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-85088</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-85088 — Apache Thrift, Apache Thrift: The C++ and D clients fall back to the certificate Common Name when subjectAltName entrie…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516291+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-85088</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-85088"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:74369</id>
    <title>RHSA-2026:74369 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516309+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via improper handling of compressed data thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via uninitialized pointer access in c_glib bindings thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via excessive resource allocation in Delphi buffered transport thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via buffer overflow in PHP bindings thrift: Apache Thrift: Denial of Service via deeply nested unknown fields thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via excessive memory allocation thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via integer underflow in THeaderTransport thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via excessive memory allocation in WebSocket transport thrift: thrift: Information disclosure via improper certificate validation in Perl bindings thrift: thrift: Man-in-the-middle attacks via improper certificate validation thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via improper message handling in language bindings thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via TJSONProtocol in Node.js bindings thrift: thrift: Prototype pollution in JavaScript bindings thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via infinite loop in D language bindings thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via improper exception handling in TNonblockingServer thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via stack-based buffer overflow in THeaderProtocol thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via memory leak in THeaderTransport thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via excessive memory allocation in Dart bindings thrift: thrift: Denial of Service via improper length parameter handling in Lua…</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:74369"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-85088</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-85088</title>
    <updated>2026-10-17T05:23:17.516353+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: thrift, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: thrift, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: thrift, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: thrift</p>
<p>Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in the C++ and D libraries of Apache Thrift. Both libraries install a default access manager for client sockets — TSSLSocketFactory does so in C++, and the accessManager property does so in D — which compares the peer certificate against the host name that was connected to. That comparison walks the subjectAltName dNSName entries first and consults the certificate Common Name afterwards. A name that does not match yields a "skip" result rather than a rejection, so a certificate whose subjectAltName entries are all present and all non-matching falls through to the Common Name, which can then satisfy the check. RFC 6125 section 6.4.4, and RFC 9525 section 2, require that the Common Name is not consulted when a dNSName subjectAltName is present. A certificate carrying subjectAltName entries for one name and a Common Name for another is therefore accepted for a connection to the second name. Exploitation requires an attacker positioned on the network path who holds a certificate that chains to a certificate authority in the client's trust store and whose Common Name matches the connected host name. Public certificate authorities have not issued on Common Name alone for many years, so this is principally a concern for deployments using a private or enterprise public-key infrastructure. This issue affects the C++ library of Apache Thrift from 0.7.0 through 0.24.0 and the D library from 0.9.0 through 0.24.0. Users should upgrade…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-85088"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
