<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:13.622084+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11010</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-11010</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233593+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-11010</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11010"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/brew-ansible@10-cve-2026-69247</id>
    <title>BREW-ansible@10-CVE-2026-69247 — cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233636+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Homebrew: ansible@10</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>`pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the
outcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`'s `encryptedKey` in several
distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the
RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An
application that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the
outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the
content-encryption key.</p>
<p>Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` → build an AES
cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed
differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:</p>
<p>1. invalid RSA padding → `Decryption failed`
2. valid padding, bad key length → `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N`
3. correct length, wrong key → `Invalid padding bytes.`
4. the real key → plaintext</p>
<p>Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection:
OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels,
invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of
pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming
ciphertexts.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData`
matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as
an S/MIME gateway or mail filter.</p>
<p>### Fix</p>
<p>Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/brew-ansible@10-cve-2026-69247"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1094</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-1094 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquan…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233694+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-1094</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1094"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-cf86587</id>
    <title>Withdrawn: CLEANSTART-2026-CF86587 — Security fixes in litellm-database 1.94.3-r0</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233712+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: litellm-database</p>
<p>Package litellm-database version 1.94.3-r0 fixes 3 vulnerabilities: CVE-2026-69247, CVE-2026-69248, CVE-2026-69249</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-cf86587"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344071</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-344071</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233734+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-344071</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344071"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-69247</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-69247</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233746+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. From 44.0.0 until 50.0.0, pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime reported the outcome of decrypting a RecipientInfo's encryptedKey in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied EnvelopedData and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key. Decryption ran as RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of encryptedKey, build an AES cipher from the result, then AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Invalid RSA padding, a valid padding with a bad key length, a correct length with a wrong key, and the real key each failed or succeeded differently. Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted EnvelopedData matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter. This issue is fixed in 50.0.0.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-69247"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g6cj-pr64-35w5</id>
    <title>GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5 — cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233776+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: cryptography</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>`pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the
outcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`'s `encryptedKey` in several
distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the
RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An
application that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the
outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the
content-encryption key.</p>
<p>Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` → build an AES
cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed
differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:</p>
<p>1. invalid RSA padding → `Decryption failed`
2. valid padding, bad key length → `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N`
3. correct length, wrong key → `Invalid padding bytes.`
4. the real key → plaintext</p>
<p>Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection:
OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels,
invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of
pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming
ciphertexts.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData`
matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as
an S/MIME gateway or mail filter.</p>
<p>### Fix</p>
<p>Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g6cj-pr64-35w5"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11468-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11468-1 — python313-cryptography-50.0.0-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233819+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>python313-cryptography-50.0.0-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11468-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-3552</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-3552 — cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233840+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: cryptography</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>`pkcs7_decrypt_der`, `pkcs7_decrypt_pem`, and `pkcs7_decrypt_smime` reported the
outcome of decrypting a `RecipientInfo`'s `encryptedKey` in several
distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the
RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An
application that decrypts attacker-supplied `EnvelopedData` and reflects the
outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the
content-encryption key.</p>
<p>Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of `encryptedKey` → build an AES
cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed
differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:</p>
<p>1. invalid RSA padding → `Decryption failed`
2. valid padding, bad key length → `Invalid key size (N) for AES.`, disclosing `N`
3. correct length, wrong key → `Invalid padding bytes.`
4. the real key → plaintext</p>
<p>Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection:
OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels,
invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of
pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming
ciphertexts.</p>
<p>Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted `EnvelopedData`
matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as
an S/MIME gateway or mail filter.</p>
<p>### Fix</p>
<p>Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now r…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-3552"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:55543</id>
    <title>RHSA-2026:55543 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233880+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() openssl: openssl-src: OpenSSL: Memory leak leads to Denial of Service in OCSP response checking python-cryptography: python-cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData…</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:55543"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23404-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23404-1 — Security update for python-cryptography</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233934+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for python-cryptography</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23404-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-69247</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-69247</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:25:14.233951+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-cryptography</p>
<p>cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. From 44.0.0 until 50.0.0, pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime reported the outcome of decrypting a RecipientInfo's encryptedKey in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied EnvelopedData and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key. Decryption ran as RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of encryptedKey, build an AES cipher from the result, then AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Invalid RSA padding, a valid padding with a bad key length, a correct length with a wrong key, and the real key each failed or succeeded differently. Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted EnvelopedData matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter. This issue is fixed in 50.0.0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-69247"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
