<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.437974+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64293</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64293</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.545896+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64293"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-1162 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.545947+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-1162</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1162"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353207</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-353207</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.545967+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-353207</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353207"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64293</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-64293</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.545979+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read</p>
<p>The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT
path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):</p>
<p>if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &amp;&amp;
	    sizeof(hdr) + cur-&gt;data_len &gt; count - done) {</p>
<p>hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr)
evaluates to the size of the pointer.  Surrounding code uses
sizeof(*hdr) consistently:</p>
<p>if (done &gt;= count || sizeof(*hdr) &gt; count - done) {
	...
	if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {
	...
	done += sizeof(*hdr);</p>
<p>struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields,
flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two
expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.</p>
<p>On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by
4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur-&gt;data_len to exceed
count - done while 4 + cur-&gt;data_len does not will pass the check,
then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len
bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.</p>
<p>It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct
iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check
should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer
width.</p>
<p>Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual
amount that will be copied.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64293"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rq5j-2985-g74r</id>
    <title>GHSA-rq5j-2985-g74r</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.546020+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read</p>
<p>The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT
path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):</p>
<p>if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &amp;&amp;
	    sizeof(hdr) + cur-&gt;data_len &gt; count - done) {</p>
<p>hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr)
evaluates to the size of the pointer.  Surrounding code uses
sizeof(*hdr) consistently:</p>
<p>if (done &gt;= count || sizeof(*hdr) &gt; count - done) {
	...
	if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {
	...
	done += sizeof(*hdr);</p>
<p>struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields,
flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two
expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.</p>
<p>On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by
4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur-&gt;data_len to exceed
count - done while 4 + cur-&gt;data_len does not will pass the check,
then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len
bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.</p>
<p>It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct
iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check
should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer
width.</p>
<p>Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual
amount that will be copied.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rq5j-2985-g74r"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11476-1 — kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.546051+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-7.1.7-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11476-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64293</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64293</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.546269+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 119 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr): 	if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &amp;&amp; 	    sizeof(hdr) + cur-&gt;data_len &gt; count - done) { hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr) evaluates to the size of the pointer.  Surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr) consistently: 	if (done &gt;= count || sizeof(*hdr) &gt; count - done) { 	... 	if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) { 	... 	done += sizeof(*hdr); struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields, flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended. On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by 4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur-&gt;data_len to exceed count - done while 4 + cur-&gt;data_len does not will pass the check, then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer. It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer width. Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual amount that will be copied.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64293"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2527 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T23:22:35.546453+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
