<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.844655+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:67154</id>
    <title>ALSA-2026:67154 — Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958568+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:10: openssl, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-perl</p>
<p>OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.</p>
<p>Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
  * openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
  * openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
  * openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
  * openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
  * openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
  * openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
  * openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
  * openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)</p>
<p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p>
<p>* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 10.2.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-212362)</p>
<p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:67154"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14717</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-14717</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958663+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-14717</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14717"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63075</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-63075</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958682+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63075"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1079</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-1079 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de s…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958705+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-1079</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1079"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358671</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-358671</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958721+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-358671</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358671"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63075</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-63075</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958733+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly
sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the
QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the
connection.</p>
<p>Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can
cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service
through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent
QUIC connections.</p>
<p>CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling</p>
<p>Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet,
there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge
that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL
implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless.
In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and
then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the 
OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames),
and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like
legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth
on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service.</p>
<p>The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only
packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing
the ACK-only packet metadata itself.</p>
<p>FIPS impact: no
The OpenSSL FI…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63075"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cj75-r57j-r5v8</id>
    <title>GHSA-cj75-r57j-r5v8</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958773+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly
sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the
QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the
connection.</p>
<p>Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can
cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service
through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent
QUIC connections.</p>
<p>CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling</p>
<p>Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet,
there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge
that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL
implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless.
In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and
then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the 
OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames),
and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like
legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth
on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service.</p>
<p>The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only
packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing
the ACK-only packet metadata itself.</p>
<p>FIPS impact: no
The OpenSSL FI…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cj75-r57j-r5v8"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63075</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-63075 — QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958803+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-63075</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63075"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3830</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-3830 — openssl security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958820+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4: openssl</p>
<p>OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,
a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and
also sends the typically omitted &amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;quot; TLS extension.</p>
<p>Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of
an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.</p>
<p>CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference</p>
<p>Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests
that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration
is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or
signed by any convenient CA).</p>
<p>When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the
&amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;quot; extension is handled reliably even without the
fix, and peer clients or servers that don&amp;apos;t support raw public keys may be
able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding
certificate or its public key.</p>
<p>Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate
need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.</p>
<p>FIPS impact: no</p>
<p>No FIP…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3830"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11623-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1 — libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958910+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11623-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:59635</id>
    <title>RHSA-2026:59635 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.958934+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_veri…</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:59635"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:67154</id>
    <title>RLSA-2026:67154 — Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.959000+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Rocky Linux:10: openssl</p>
<p>OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.</p>
<p>Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)</p>
<p>* openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)</p>
<p>* openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)</p>
<p>* openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)</p>
<p>* openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)</p>
<p>* openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)</p>
<p>* openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)</p>
<p>* openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)</p>
<p>* openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)</p>
<p>Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):</p>
<p>* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-212362)</p>
<p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:67154"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23463-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23463-1 — Security update for openssl-3</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.959035+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for openssl-3</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23463-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63075</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63075</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.959056+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2-hwe, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl</p>
<p>Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the connection. Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent QUIC connections. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet, there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless. In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames), and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service. The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing the ACK-only packet metadata itself. FIPS impact: no The OpenSSL FIPS mod…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63075"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3005</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3005 — OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T15:31:40.959095+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3005"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
