<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:23.915349+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14987</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-14987</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110461+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-14987</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14987"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-53877</id>
    <title>BIT-django-2026-53877 — Heap buffer over-read in GDALRaster</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110498+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: django</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.
`django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-53877"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-333696</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-333696</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110534+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-333696</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-333696"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53877</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-53877</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110548+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.
`django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53877"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-crhf-3pfg-w68w</id>
    <title>GHSA-crhf-3pfg-w68w — Django: GDALRaster may over-read heap memory when constructed from bytes</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110572+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.
`django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-crhf-3pfg-w68w"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3074</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-3074 — python-django security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110595+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: python-django</p>
<p>A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>This issue was discovered in version 6.0, before 6.0.5, and before 5.2.14. If the session has not been modified, the cookie&amp;amp;#39;s response header does not change, but &amp;amp;quot;SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST&amp;amp;quot; is &amp;amp;quot;true&amp;amp;quot;. A remote attacker could steal a user&amp;amp;#39;s session after the user visits a cached public page. Earlier unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) have not been evaluated and may also be affected. Django thanks Cantina for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-35192)</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6.
`django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not add `Authorization` to the `Vary` response header for requests bearing that header without `Cache-Control: public`, which allows remote attackers to read private cached responses via unauthenticated requests to the same URL.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Shai Berger for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-35193)</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6.
`django.utils.cache.has_vary_header()` in Django does not strip leading or trailing whitespace from `Vary` response header values before comparison, which allows remote attackers to read cached responses via request…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3074"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11235-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11235-1 — python313-Django4-4.2.30-4.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110648+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>python313-Django4-4.2.30-4.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11235-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2091</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-2091</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110697+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.
`django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2091"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:2819-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:2819-1 — Security update for python-Django</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110717+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for python-Django</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:2819-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53877</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-53877</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110733+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:25.10: python-django, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-django</p>
<p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53877"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2231</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2231 — Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T10:55:24.110763+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial of Service zu verursachen und Daten zu manipulieren.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2231"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
