<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T16:04:00.394963+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-339402</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-339402</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T16:04:00.465294+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-339402</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-339402"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47410</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-47410</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T16:04:00.465338+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have an insecure default cryptographic key. The JWT signing secret defaults to the hardcoded literal `"dev-secret-change-me"` when `PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET` is unset. A safety check exists but only fires when `PLATFORM_ENV != "dev"`; the default value of `PLATFORM_ENV` is `"dev"`, so the check is silently bypassed in any deployment that does not explicitly opt out. The attacker reads the literal from this public source file, mints a JWT with arbitrary `sub` and `email` claims, and authenticates as any existing user (including workspace owners and admins). PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-47410"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3qg8-5g3r-79v5</id>
    <title>GHSA-3qg8-5g3r-79v5 — praisonai-platform: JWT signing key defaults to hardcoded "dev-secret-change-me", allowing token forgery for any user w…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T16:04:00.465383+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonai-platform</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>**Type:** Insecure default cryptographic key. The JWT signing secret defaults to the hardcoded literal `"dev-secret-change-me"` when `PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET` is unset. A safety check exists but only fires when `PLATFORM_ENV != "dev"`; the default value of `PLATFORM_ENV` is `"dev"`, so the check is silently bypassed in any deployment that does not explicitly opt out. The attacker reads the literal from this public source file, mints a JWT with arbitrary `sub` and `email` claims, and authenticates as any existing user (including workspace owners and admins).
**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/auth_service.py`, lines 25-36 and 114-137.
**Root cause:** the production-mode guard checks `os.environ.get("PLATFORM_ENV", "dev") != "dev"` — but the default is `"dev"`, so a clean deployment that just imports the package and runs `uvicorn praisonai_platform.api.app:app` proceeds with the hardcoded secret. The package documentation does not warn loudly enough that BOTH variables must be set; the guard suppresses itself when either condition is missed. JWT verification at line 129 trusts whatever the token says (`sub`, `email`, `name`) once the HMAC-SHA256 signature validates against the publicly-known secret. Since the verifier accepts forged tokens for any user_id, the attacker becomes that user across every authenticated route.</p>
<p>## Affected Code</p>
<p>**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/auth_service.py`, lines 25-36 and 114-137.…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3qg8-5g3r-79v5"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-479</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-479 — praisonai-platform: JWT signing key defaults to hardcoded "dev-secret-change-me", allowing token forgery for any user w…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T16:04:00.465466+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: praisonai-platform</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>**Type:** Insecure default cryptographic key. The JWT signing secret defaults to the hardcoded literal `"dev-secret-change-me"` when `PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET` is unset. A safety check exists but only fires when `PLATFORM_ENV != "dev"`; the default value of `PLATFORM_ENV` is `"dev"`, so the check is silently bypassed in any deployment that does not explicitly opt out. The attacker reads the literal from this public source file, mints a JWT with arbitrary `sub` and `email` claims, and authenticates as any existing user (including workspace owners and admins).
 **File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/auth_service.py`, lines 25-36 and 114-137.
**Root cause:** the production-mode guard checks `os.environ.get("PLATFORM_ENV", "dev") != "dev"` — but the default is `"dev"`, so a clean deployment that just imports the package and runs `uvicorn praisonai_platform.api.app:app` proceeds with the hardcoded secret. The package documentation does not warn loudly enough that BOTH variables must be set; the guard suppresses itself when either condition is missed. JWT verification at line 129 trusts whatever the token says (`sub`, `email`, `name`) once the HMAC-SHA256 signature validates against the publicly-known secret. Since the verifier accepts forged tokens for any user_id, the attacker becomes that user across every authenticated route.</p>
<p>## Affected Code</p>
<p>**File:** `src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/auth_service.py`, lines 25-36 and 114-137.…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-479"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
