<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.430486+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-45985</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2026-45985</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741723+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-45985"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0696</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-0696 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741800+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-0696</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0696"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-321878</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-321878</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741821+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-321878</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-321878"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45985</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-45985</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741835+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before submitting I/O</p>
<p>When allocating blocks during within-EOF DIO and writeback with
dioread_nolock enabled, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO was set to split an
existing large unwritten extent. However, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT was
set when calling ext4_split_convert_extents(), which may potentially
result in stale data issues.</p>
<p>Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the second half.</p>
<p>[UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent        U: unwritten extent
   [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
            |&lt;-   -&gt;| ----&gt; dio write this range</p>
<p>First, ext4_iomap_alloc() call ext4_map_blocks() with
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT and
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE flags set. ext4_map_blocks() find this extent and
call ext4_split_convert_extents() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and the
above flags set.</p>
<p>Then, ext4_split_convert_extents() calls ext4_split_extent() with
EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2
flags set, and it calls ext4_split_extent_at() to split the second half
with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1, EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT
and EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 flags set. However, ext4_split_extent_at()
failed to insert extent since a temporary lack -ENOSPC. It zeroes out
the first half but convert the entire on-disk extent to written since
the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set, but left the second half as un…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-45985"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qwcw-8jc7-8mhw</id>
    <title>GHSA-qwcw-8jc7-8mhw</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741881+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before submitting I/O</p>
<p>When allocating blocks during within-EOF DIO and writeback with
dioread_nolock enabled, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO was set to split an
existing large unwritten extent. However, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT was
set when calling ext4_split_convert_extents(), which may potentially
result in stale data issues.</p>
<p>Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the second half.</p>
<p>[UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent        U: unwritten extent
   [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
            |&lt;-   -&gt;| ----&gt; dio write this range</p>
<p>First, ext4_iomap_alloc() call ext4_map_blocks() with
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT and
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE flags set. ext4_map_blocks() find this extent and
call ext4_split_convert_extents() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and the
above flags set.</p>
<p>Then, ext4_split_convert_extents() calls ext4_split_extent() with
EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2
flags set, and it calls ext4_split_extent_at() to split the second half
with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1, EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT
and EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 flags set. However, ext4_split_extent_at()
failed to insert extent since a temporary lack -ENOSPC. It zeroes out
the first half but convert the entire on-disk extent to written since
the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set, but left the second half as un…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qwcw-8jc7-8mhw"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-2674 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.741915+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>btrfs: qgroup: fix race between quota disable and quota rescan ioctl</p>
<p>There&amp;apos;s a race between a task disabling quotas and another running the
rescan ioctl that can result in a use-after-free of qgroup records from
the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree rbtree.</p>
<p>This happens as follows:</p>
<p>1) Task A enters btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() -&amp;gt; btrfs_qgroup_rescan();</p>
<p>2) Task B enters btrfs_quota_disable() and calls
   btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which does nothing because at that
   point fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_rescan_running is false (it wasn&amp;apos;t set yet by
   task A);</p>
<p>3) Task B calls btrfs_free_qgroup_config() which starts freeing qgroups
   from fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree without taking the lock fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock;</p>
<p>4) Task A enters qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() which starts iterating
   the fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_tree tree while holding fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock,
   but task B is freeing qgroup records from that tree without holding
   the lock, resulting in a use-after-free.</p>
<p>Fix this by taking fs_info-&amp;gt;qgroup_lock at btrfs_free_qgroup_config().
Also at btrfs_qgroup_rescan() don&amp;apos;t start the rescan worker if quotas
were already disabled.(CVE-2025-39759)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>wifi: wilc1000: avoid buffer overflow in WID string configuration</p>
<p>Fix the following copy overflow warning identi…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2674"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21388-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21388-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.742288+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21388-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22521-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:22521-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.742445+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22521-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-45985</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-45985</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.742507+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 231 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before submitting I/O When allocating blocks during within-EOF DIO and writeback with dioread_nolock enabled, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO was set to split an existing large unwritten extent. However, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT was set when calling ext4_split_convert_extents(), which may potentially result in stale data issues. Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the second half.    [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent        U: unwritten extent    [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree             |&lt;-   -&gt;| ----&gt; dio write this range First, ext4_iomap_alloc() call ext4_map_blocks() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT and EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE flags set. ext4_map_blocks() find this extent and call ext4_split_convert_extents() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and the above flags set. Then, ext4_split_convert_extents() calls ext4_split_extent() with EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, and it calls ext4_split_extent_at() to split the second half with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1, EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 flags set. However, ext4_split_extent_at() failed to insert extent since a temporary lack -ENOSPC. It zeroes out the first half but convert the entire on-disk extent to written since the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set, but left the second half as unwritte…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-45985"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-1700 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T03:04:56.742783+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1700"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
