<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.331555+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cosign-2026-24122</id>
    <title>BIT-cosign-2026-24122 — Cosign Certificate Chain Expiry Validation Issue Allows Issuing Certificate Expiry to Be Overlooked</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488641+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: cosign</p>
<p>Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-cosign-2026-24122"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-ba61304</id>
    <title>Withdrawn: CLEANSTART-2026-BA61304 — Security fixes in cosign 2.4.3-r0</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488717+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Withdrawn by the publisher.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: cosign</p>
<p>Package cosign version 2.4.3-r0 fixes 82 vulnerabilities: CVE-2025-0913, CVE-2025-15558, CVE-2025-22868, CVE-2025-22869, CVE-2025-22870...</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cleanstart-2026-ba61304"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-268951</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-268951</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488742+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-268951</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-268951"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-24122</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-24122</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488756+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-24122"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wfqv-66vq-46rm</id>
    <title>GHSA-wfqv-66vq-46rm — Cosign considered signatures valid with expired intermediate certificates when transparency log verification is skipped</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488784+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/sigstore/cosign</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. An issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>No impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. In practice, this is unlikely to occur as CAs should not be issuing certificates that outlive the validity of the CA and its parents.</p>
<p>## Workarounds</p>
<p>Upgrade to the latest release, or verify the certificate chain out of band.</p>
<p>## Example to Reproduce</p>
<p>* Root CA certificate is valid from 12pm-2pm
* Intermediate CA certificate is valid from 12:30pm-1:30pm
* Leaf certificate is valid from 1pm-3pm - **Note that this is unlikely to happen in practice**, as a CA shouldn't issue a certificate that would be valid after the issuing CA certificate expires
* Signature generated at 2:30pm with a signed timestamp
* During verification, the leaf certificate's not before time (1pm) is used to verify the chain -…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wfqv-66vq-46rm"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10235-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10235-1 — cosign-3.0.5-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488826+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>cosign-3.0.5-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10235-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20904-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:20904-1 — Security update for cosign</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488846+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for cosign</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:20904-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-24122</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-24122</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T11:29:29.488864+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:25.10: cosign, Ubuntu:Pro:26.04:LTS: cosign</p>
<p>Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. In versions 3.0.4 and below, an issuing certificate with a validity that expires before the leaf certificate will be considered valid during verification even if the provided timestamp would mean the issuing certificate should be considered expired. When verifying artifact signatures using a certificate, Cosign first verifies the certificate chain using the leaf certificate's "not before" timestamp and later checks expiry of the leaf certificate using either a signed timestamp provided by the Rekor transparency log or from a timestamp authority, or using the current time. The root and all issuing certificates are assumed to be valid during the leaf certificate's validity. There is no impact to users of the public Sigstore infrastructure. This may affect private deployments with customized PKIs. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.5.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-24122"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
