<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.429010+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329100</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-329100</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.520248+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-329100</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329100"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-12050</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-12050</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.520285+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>SQL injection in pgAdmin 4's named restore point endpoint (POST /browser/server/restore_point/{gid}/{sid}). The user-supplied 'value' field was interpolated directly into the SQL string with str.format() instead of being passed as a bound parameter, allowing an authenticated pgAdmin user with a connected PostgreSQL session to inject additional statements through that endpoint.</p>
<p>The injected SQL executes under the database role the user is already authenticated as. The defect does not cross a privilege boundary -- the user already has direct SQL access to that role through the Query Tool -- so the attacker gains no capability beyond what their database role already grants them. The marginal impact accounts for the fact that the injection path is not the documented SQL-execution interface, so a deployment that gates the Query Tool at the application layer could see SQL executed through a path it did not anticipate.</p>
<p>Fix passes the restore point name as a bound parameter and schema-qualifies the function call as pg_catalog.pg_create_restore_point so a non-default search_path on the connection cannot redirect the call to a shadow definition. A regression test asserts the value arrives as a bound parameter and not spliced into the SQL string.</p>
<p>This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 1.0 before 9.16.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-12050"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v395-x24j-4r3g</id>
    <title>GHSA-v395-x24j-4r3g</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.520330+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>SQL injection in pgAdmin 4's named restore point endpoint (POST /browser/server/restore_point/{gid}/{sid}). The user-supplied 'value' field was interpolated directly into the SQL string with str.format() instead of being passed as a bound parameter, allowing an authenticated pgAdmin user with a connected PostgreSQL session to inject additional statements through that endpoint.</p>
<p>The injected SQL executes under the database role the user is already authenticated as. The defect does not cross a privilege boundary -- the user already has direct SQL access to that role through the Query Tool -- so the attacker gains no capability beyond what their database role already grants them. The marginal impact accounts for the fact that the injection path is not the documented SQL-execution interface, so a deployment that gates the Query Tool at the application layer could see SQL executed through a path it did not anticipate.</p>
<p>Fix passes the restore point name as a bound parameter and schema-qualifies the function call as pg_catalog.pg_create_restore_point so a non-default search_path on the connection cannot redirect the call to a shadow definition. A regression test asserts the value arrives as a bound parameter and not spliced into the SQL string.</p>
<p>This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 1.0 before 9.16.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v395-x24j-4r3g"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11508-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11508-1 — pgadmin4-9.17-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.520357+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>pgadmin4-9.17-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11508-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2005</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2005 — pgAdmin: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T22:21:54.520385+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in pgAdmin ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code mit Benutzer- oder Administratorrechten auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, SQL-Injection- und Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen, Benutzer auf bösartige Websites umzuleiten, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder Daten zu manipulieren.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2005"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
