<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:49.823583+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11431</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-11431</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143713+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-11431</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-11431"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68725</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-68725</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143790+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-68725"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0166</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-0166 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143840+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-0166</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0166"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-364596</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-364596</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143868+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-364596</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-364596"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68725</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-68725</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143889+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack</p>
<p>Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a
skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -&gt; gso_features_check().
When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet
to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload
warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled.</p>
<p>We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting
gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense
that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due
to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy
through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific
assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further
into the GSO engine in the first place.</p>
<p>The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: validate gso_type in GSO
handlers") because there were malicious (syzbot) senders that combine
a protocol with a non-matching gso_type. If we would want to drop such
packets, gso_features_check() currently only returns feature flags via
netif_skb_features(), so one location for potentially dropping such skbs
could be validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(), but then otoh it would be
an additional check in the fast-path for a very corner case. Given
bpf_clone_redirect() is the only place where BPF test infra…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-68725"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-696c-x544-xmc9</id>
    <title>GHSA-696c-x544-xmc9</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143953+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack</p>
<p>Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a
skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -&gt; gso_features_check().
When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet
to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload
warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled.</p>
<p>We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting
gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense
that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due
to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy
through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific
assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further
into the GSO engine in the first place.</p>
<p>The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: validate gso_type in GSO
handlers") because there were malicious (syzbot) senders that combine
a protocol with a non-matching gso_type. If we would want to drop such
packets, gso_features_check() currently only returns feature flags via
netif_skb_features(), so one location for potentially dropping such skbs
could be validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(), but then otoh it would be
an additional check in the fast-path for a very corner case. Given
bpf_clone_redirect() is the only place where BPF test infra…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-696c-x544-xmc9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-209-04</id>
    <title>ICSA-26-209-04 — Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.143987+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).</p>
<p>Siemens is preparing fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-209-04"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68725</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-68725 — bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.144215+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-68725</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-68725"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1759</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-1759 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.144232+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>iommu/s390: Implement blocking domain</p>
<p>This fixes a crash when surprise hot-unplugging a PCI device. This crash
happens because during hot-unplug __iommu_group_set_domain_nofail()
attaching the default domain fails when the platform no longer
recognizes the device as it has already been removed and we end up with
a NULL domain pointer and UAF. This is exactly the case referred to in
the second comment in __iommu_device_set_domain() and just as stated
there if we can instead attach the blocking domain the UAF is prevented
as this can handle the already removed device. Implement the blocking
domain to use this handling.  With this change, the crash is fixed but
we still hit a warning attempting to change DMA ownership on a blocked
device.(CVE-2024-53232)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>iommu: Fix two issues in iommu_copy_struct_from_user()</p>
<p>In the review for iommu_copy_struct_to_user() helper, Matt pointed out that
a NULL pointer should be rejected prior to dereferencing it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/(CVE-2025-37900)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>smb: client: Avoid race in open_cached_dir with lease breaks</p>
<p>A pre-existing valid cfid returned from find_or_create_cached_dir might
race with a lease break, meaning open_cached_dir doesn&amp;apos;t consider it
valid,…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1759"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10039-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:10039-1 — kernel-devel-6.18.5-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.144798+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-6.18.5-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10039-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-019113</id>
    <title>SSA-019113 — SSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.144865+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the firmware version V3.1.6 for the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP (incl. SIPLUS variant).</p>
<p>Siemens has released new versions for several affected products and recommends to update to the latest versions. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-019113"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0587-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2026:0587-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.145081+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:0587-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68725</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68725</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.145183+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 178 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -&gt; gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers") because there were malicious (syzbot) senders that combine a protocol with a non-matching gso_type. If we would want to drop such packets, gso_features_check() currently only returns feature flags via netif_skb_features(), so one location for potentially dropping such skbs could be validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(), but then otoh it would be an additional check in the fast-path for a very corner case. Given bpf_clone_redirect() is the only place where BPF test infra coul…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-68725"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2920</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2920 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:24:50.145437+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2920"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
