<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T07:52:01.080912+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-239148</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-239148</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T07:52:01.125917+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-239148</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-239148"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-46721</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-46721</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T07:52:01.125952+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>nosurf is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection middleware for Go. A vulnerability in versions prior to 1.2.0 allows an attacker who controls content on the target site, or on a subdomain of the target site (either via XSS, or otherwise) to bypass CSRF checks and issue requests on user's behalf. Due to misuse of the Go `net/http` library, nosurf categorizes all incoming requests as plain-text HTTP requests, in which case the `Referer` header is not checked to have the same origin as the target webpage. If the attacker has control over HTML contents on either the target website (e.g. `example.com`), or on a website hosted on a subdomain of the target (e.g. `attacker.example.com`), they will also be able to manipulate cookies set for the target website. By acquiring the secret CSRF token from the cookie, or overriding the cookie with a new token known to the attacker, `attacker.example.com` is able to craft cross-site requests to `example.com`. A patch for the issue was released in nosurf 1.2.0. In lieu of upgrading to a patched version of nosurf, users may additionally use another HTTP middleware to ensure that a non-safe HTTP request is coming from the same origin (e.g. by requiring a `Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin` header in the request).</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-46721"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-w9hf-35q4-vcjw</id>
    <title>GHSA-w9hf-35q4-vcjw — nosurf vulnerable to CSRF due to non-functional same-origin request checks</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T07:52:01.125994+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/justinas/nosurf</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>This vulnerability allows an attacker who controls content on the target site, or on a subdomain of the target site (either via XSS, or otherwise) to bypass Cross-Site Request Forgery checks and issue requests on user's behalf.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>Due to misuse of the Go `net/http` library, nosurf categorizes all incoming requests as plain-text HTTP requests, in which case the `Referer` header is not checked to have the same origin as the target webpage.</p>
<p>If the attacker has control over HTML contents on either the target website (e.g. `example.com`), or on a website hosted on a subdomain of the target (e.g. `attacker.example.com`), they will also be able to manipulate cookies set for the target website. By acquiring the secret CSRF token from the cookie, or overriding the cookie with a new token known to the attacker, `attacker.example.com` is able to craft cross-site requests to `example.com`.</p>
<p>### Patches</p>
<p>A patch for the issue was released in nosurf 1.2.0.</p>
<p>### Workarounds</p>
<p>In lieu of upgrading to a patched version of nosurf, users may additionally use another HTTP middleware to ensure that a non-safe HTTP request is coming from the same origin (e.g. by requiring a `Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin` header in the request).</p>
<p>### References</p>
<p>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rq77-p4h8-4crw
https://github.com/justinas/nosurf-cve-2025-46721
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46721
https://github.com/justinas/nosurf/releases/tag/v1.2.0</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-w9hf-35q4-vcjw"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:15135-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:15135-1 — govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250515T200012-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T07:52:01.126034+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250515T200012-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:15135-1"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
