<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.344521+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:0453</id>
    <title>ALSA-2026:0453 — Important: kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515128+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> AlmaLinux:10: kernel-abi-stablelists, AlmaLinux:10: kernel-doc</p>
<p>The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system.</p>
<p>Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>* kernel: HID: multitouch: fix slab out-of-bounds access in mt_report_fixup() (CVE-2025-39806)
  * kernel: audit: fix out-of-bounds read in audit_compare_dname_path() (CVE-2025-39840)
  * kernel: mm: slub: avoid wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare (CVE-2025-39843)
  * kernel: net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver (CVE-2025-39905)
  * kernel: iommufd: Fix race during abort for file descriptors (CVE-2025-39966)
  * kernel: tls: wait for pending async decryptions if tls_strp_msg_hold fails (CVE-2025-40176)
  * kernel: sctp: avoid NULL dereference when chunk data buffer is missing (CVE-2025-40240)
  * kernel: drm/vmwgfx: Validate command header size against SVGA_CMD_MAX_DATASIZE (CVE-2025-40277)
  * kernel: usb: dwc3: Fix race condition between concurrent dwc3_remove_requests() call paths (CVE-2025-68287)</p>
<p>For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:0453"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39905</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39905</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515210+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39905"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0056</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-0056 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515267+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-0056</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0056"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314819</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-314819</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515304+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-314819</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314819"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39905</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-39905</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515318+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver</p>
<p>Currently phylink_resolve() protects itself against concurrent
phylink_bringup_phy() or phylink_disconnect_phy() calls which modify
pl-&gt;phydev by relying on pl-&gt;state_mutex.</p>
<p>The problem is that in phylink_resolve(), pl-&gt;state_mutex is in a lock
inversion state with pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock. So pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock needs to be
acquired prior to pl-&gt;state_mutex. But that requires dereferencing
pl-&gt;phydev in the first place, and without pl-&gt;state_mutex, that is
racy.</p>
<p>Hence the reason for the extra lock. Currently it is redundant, but it
will serve a functional purpose once mutex_lock(&amp;phy-&gt;lock) will be
moved outside of the mutex_lock(&amp;pl-&gt;state_mutex) section.</p>
<p>Another alternative considered would have been to let phylink_resolve()
acquire the rtnl_mutex, which is also held when phylink_bringup_phy()
and phylink_disconnect_phy() are called. But since phylink_disconnect_phy()
runs under rtnl_lock(), it would deadlock with phylink_resolve() when
calling flush_work(&amp;pl-&gt;resolve). Additionally, it would have been
undesirable because it would have unnecessarily blocked many other call
paths as well in the entire kernel, so the smaller-scoped lock was
preferred.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39905"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3w4m-c8rq-62jj</id>
    <title>GHSA-3w4m-c8rq-62jj</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515359+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver</p>
<p>Currently phylink_resolve() protects itself against concurrent
phylink_bringup_phy() or phylink_disconnect_phy() calls which modify
pl-&gt;phydev by relying on pl-&gt;state_mutex.</p>
<p>The problem is that in phylink_resolve(), pl-&gt;state_mutex is in a lock
inversion state with pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock. So pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock needs to be
acquired prior to pl-&gt;state_mutex. But that requires dereferencing
pl-&gt;phydev in the first place, and without pl-&gt;state_mutex, that is
racy.</p>
<p>Hence the reason for the extra lock. Currently it is redundant, but it
will serve a functional purpose once mutex_lock(&amp;phy-&gt;lock) will be
moved outside of the mutex_lock(&amp;pl-&gt;state_mutex) section.</p>
<p>Another alternative considered would have been to let phylink_resolve()
acquire the rtnl_mutex, which is also held when phylink_bringup_phy()
and phylink_disconnect_phy() are called. But since phylink_disconnect_phy()
runs under rtnl_lock(), it would deadlock with phylink_resolve() when
calling flush_work(&amp;pl-&gt;resolve). Additionally, it would have been
undesirable because it would have unnecessarily blocked many other call
paths as well in the entire kernel, so the smaller-scoped lock was
preferred.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3w4m-c8rq-62jj"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39905</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-39905 — net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515389+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-39905</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39905"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:0453</id>
    <title>RHSA-2026:0453 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515408+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel: HID: multitouch: fix slab out-of-bounds access in mt_report_fixup() kernel: audit: fix out-of-bounds read in audit_compare_dname_path() kernel: mm: slub: avoid wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare kernel: net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver kernel: iommufd: Fix race during abort for file descriptors kernel: tls: wait for pending async decryptions if tls_strp_msg_hold fails kernel: sctp: avoid NULL dereference when chunk data buffer is missing kernel: drm/vmwgfx: Validate command header size against SVGA_CMD_MAX_DATASIZE kernel: usb: dwc3: Fix race condition between concurrent dwc3_remove_requests() call paths</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:0453"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39905</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39905</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515445+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 217 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl-&gt;phydev writes with resolver Currently phylink_resolve() protects itself against concurrent phylink_bringup_phy() or phylink_disconnect_phy() calls which modify pl-&gt;phydev by relying on pl-&gt;state_mutex. The problem is that in phylink_resolve(), pl-&gt;state_mutex is in a lock inversion state with pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock. So pl-&gt;phydev-&gt;lock needs to be acquired prior to pl-&gt;state_mutex. But that requires dereferencing pl-&gt;phydev in the first place, and without pl-&gt;state_mutex, that is racy. Hence the reason for the extra lock. Currently it is redundant, but it will serve a functional purpose once mutex_lock(&amp;phy-&gt;lock) will be moved outside of the mutex_lock(&amp;pl-&gt;state_mutex) section. Another alternative considered would have been to let phylink_resolve() acquire the rtnl_mutex, which is also held when phylink_bringup_phy() and phylink_disconnect_phy() are called. But since phylink_disconnect_phy() runs under rtnl_lock(), it would deadlock with phylink_resolve() when calling flush_work(&amp;pl-&gt;resolve). Additionally, it would have been undesirable because it would have unnecessarily blocked many other call paths as well in the entire kernel, so the smaller-scoped lock was preferred.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39905"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2170</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2170 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:32:53.515773+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise um beliebigen Code auszuführen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung zu verursachen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2170"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
