<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.079481+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15676</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-15676</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753119+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-15676</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15676"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39835</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-39835</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753194+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-39835"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0825 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753232+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0825</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0825"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317167</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-317167</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753250+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-317167</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-317167"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39835</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-39835</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753262+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code</p>
<p>ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code;
namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found.</p>
<p>However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best,
this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found"
when in fact it's an IO (disk) error.</p>
<p>At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do:</p>
<p>error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &amp;bp);
	if (error == -ENOATTR)  {
		xfs_trans_brelse(args-&gt;trans, bp);
		return error;
	}</p>
<p>because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp,
and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it.</p>
<p>As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level
IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let
unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many
like this should be remapped to EIO.</p>
<p>However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr
code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope
patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later.</p>
<p>(Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the
wrong error code to userspace.)</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-39835"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x6rc-wf46-fv7m</id>
    <title>GHSA-x6rc-wf46-fv7m</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753312+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code</p>
<p>ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code;
namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found.</p>
<p>However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best,
this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found"
when in fact it's an IO (disk) error.</p>
<p>At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do:</p>
<p>error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &amp;bp);
	if (error == -ENOATTR)  {
		xfs_trans_brelse(args-&gt;trans, bp);
		return error;
	}</p>
<p>because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp,
and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it.</p>
<p>As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level
IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let
unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many
like this should be remapped to EIO.</p>
<p>However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr
code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope
patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later.</p>
<p>(Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the
wrong error code to userspace.)</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x6rc-wf46-fv7m"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10</id>
    <title>ICSA-26-134-10 — Siemens SIMATIC</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.753341+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it

[WHAT &amp; HOW]
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for
null before dereferencing.

This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles</p>
<p>Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.</p>
<p>The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.</p>
<p>There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.</p>
<p>The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 ("ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles") in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.</p>
<p>The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.</p>
<p>Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-26-134-10"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39835</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-39835 — xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.754403+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-39835</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-39835"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147</id>
    <title>NCSC-2026-0147 — Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.754421+00:00</updated>
    <content>NCSC-2026-0147</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ncsc-2026-0147"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1228</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-1228 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.754678+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks</p>
<p>There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the
commit ac0a230f719b (&amp;quot;eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid
deadlocks&amp;quot;). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic
context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface
of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing
the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have
the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the
.ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver,
so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed.(CVE-2024-38553)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>ceph: give up on paths longer than PATH_MAX</p>
<p>If the full path to be built by ceph_mdsc_build_path() happens to be
longer than PATH_MAX, then this function will enter an endless (retry)
loop, effectively blocking the whole task.  Most of the machine
becomes unusable, making this a very simple and effective DoS
vulnerability.</p>
<p>I cannot imagine why this retry was ever implemented, but it seems
rather useless and harmful to me.  Let&amp;apos;s remove it and fail with
ENAMETOOLONG instead.(CVE-2024-53685)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>Bluetooth: hc…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-1228"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.754771+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379</id>
    <title>SSA-032379 — SSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.755093+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amd/display: Check link_res-&gt;hpo_dp_link_enc before using it

[WHAT &amp; HOW]
Functions dp_enable_link_phy and dp_disable_link_phy can pass link_res
without initializing hpo_dp_link_enc and it is necessary to check for
null before dereferencing.

This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs: relax assertions on failure to encode file handles</p>
<p>Encoding file handles is usually performed by a filesystem &gt;encode_fh()
method that may fail for various reasons.</p>
<p>The legacy users of exportfs_encode_fh(), namely, nfsd and
name_to_handle_at(2) syscall are ready to cope with the possibility
of failure to encode a file handle.</p>
<p>There are a few other users of exportfs_encode_{fh,fid}() that
currently have a WARN_ON() assertion when -&gt;encode_fh() fails.
Relax those assertions because they are wrong.</p>
<p>The second linked bug report states commit 16aac5ad1fa9 ("ovl: support
encoding non-decodable file handles") in v6.6 as the regressing commit,
but this is not accurate.</p>
<p>The aforementioned commit only increases the chances of the assertion
and allows triggering the assertion with the reproducer using overlayfs,
inotify and drop_caches.</p>
<p>Triggering this assertion was always possible with other filesystems and
other reasons of -&gt;encode_fh() failures and more particularly, it was
also possible with the exact same reproducer using overlay…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-032379"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:03600-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.756167+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:03600-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39835</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-39835</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.756383+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 162 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code ENODATA (aka ENOATTR) has a very specific meaning in the xfs xattr code; namely, that the requested attribute name could not be found. However, a medium error from disk may also return ENODATA. At best, this medium error may escape to userspace as "attribute not found" when in fact it's an IO (disk) error. At worst, we may oops in xfs_attr_leaf_get() when we do: 	error = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &amp;bp); 	if (error == -ENOATTR)  { 		xfs_trans_brelse(args-&gt;trans, bp); 		return error; 	} because an ENODATA/ENOATTR error from disk leaves us with a null bp, and the xfs_trans_brelse will then null-deref it. As discussed on the list, we really need to modify the lower level IO functions to trap all disk errors and ensure that we don't let unique errors like this leak up into higher xfs functions - many like this should be remapped to EIO. However, this patch directly addresses a reported bug in the xattr code, and should be safe to backport to stable kernels. A larger-scope patch to handle more unique errors at lower levels can follow later. (Note, prior to 07120f1abdff we did not oops, but we did return the wrong error code to userspace.)</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-39835"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2077</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-2077 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T16:13:50.756583+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-2077"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
