<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:21.719754+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10806</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-10806</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037133+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-10806</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-10806"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38475</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38475</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037206+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38475"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0698 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037248+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0698</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0698"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347060</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-347060</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037274+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-347060</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-347060"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38475</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-38475</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037291+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion.</p>
<p>syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while
freeing inet_sk(sk)-&gt;inet_opt.</p>
<p>The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory.</p>
<p>cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type
confusion.</p>
<p>The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket.</p>
<p>The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the
first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses
various places.</p>
<p>In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(),
which is an address of a function in the text segment.</p>
<p>$ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux
  struct inet_sock {
  ...
          struct ip_options_rcu *    inet_opt;             /*   784     8 */</p>
<p>$ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux
  struct smc_sock {
  ...
          void                       (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /*   784     8 */</p>
<p>The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3]</p>
<p>At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET
and SMC code error-prone and hard to change.</p>
<p>Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3
("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get").</p>
<p>Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not
allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra.</p>
<p>Let's add inet_sock as the first member o…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38475"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wfpw-m32p-qqfp</id>
    <title>GHSA-wfpw-m32p-qqfp</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037378+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion.</p>
<p>syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while
freeing inet_sk(sk)-&gt;inet_opt.</p>
<p>The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory.</p>
<p>cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type
confusion.</p>
<p>The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket.</p>
<p>The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the
first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses
various places.</p>
<p>In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(),
which is an address of a function in the text segment.</p>
<p>$ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux
  struct inet_sock {
  ...
          struct ip_options_rcu *    inet_opt;             /*   784     8 */</p>
<p>$ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux
  struct smc_sock {
  ...
          void                       (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /*   784     8 */</p>
<p>The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3]</p>
<p>At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET
and SMC code error-prone and hard to change.</p>
<p>Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3
("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get").</p>
<p>Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not
allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra.</p>
<p>Let's add inet_sock as the first member o…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wfpw-m32p-qqfp"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037450+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.037862+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38475</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38475</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.038052+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 87 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smc: Fix various oops due to inet_sock type confusion. syzbot reported weird splats [0][1] in cipso_v4_sock_setattr() while freeing inet_sk(sk)-&gt;inet_opt. The address was freed multiple times even though it was read-only memory. cipso_v4_sock_setattr() did nothing wrong, and the root cause was type confusion. The cited commit made it possible to create smc_sock as an INET socket. The issue is that struct smc_sock does not have struct inet_sock as the first member but hijacks AF_INET and AF_INET6 sk_family, which confuses various places. In this case, inet_sock.inet_opt was actually smc_sock.clcsk_data_ready(), which is an address of a function in the text segment.   $ pahole -C inet_sock vmlinux   struct inet_sock {   ...           struct ip_options_rcu *    inet_opt;             /*   784     8 */   $ pahole -C smc_sock vmlinux   struct smc_sock {   ...           void                       (*clcsk_data_ready)(struct sock *); /*   784     8 */ The same issue for another field was reported before. [2][3] At that time, an ugly hack was suggested [4], but it makes both INET and SMC code error-prone and hard to change. Also, yet another variant was fixed by a hacky commit 98d4435efcbf3 ("net/smc: prevent NULL pointer dereference in txopt_get"). Instead of papering over the root cause by such hacks, we should not allow non-INET socket to reuse the INET infra. Let's add inet_sock as the first member of smc_sock. [0…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38475"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1665</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1665 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T00:59:22.038227+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1665"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
