https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10 Most recent entries from all 2026-10-03T22:54:39.978876+00:00 Vulnerability-Lookup csirt@opendfir.org python-feedgen Contains only the most 10 recent entries. https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-13489 bdu:2025-13489 2026-10-03T22:54:40.439870+00:00 bdu:2025-13489 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38114 BELL-CVE-2025-38114 2026-10-03T22:54:40.439943+00:00

Affected: Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0723 certfr-2025-avi-0723 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at… 2026-10-03T22:54:40.439976+00:00 certfr-2025-avi-0723 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-314429 EUVD-2026-314429 2026-10-03T22:54:40.439995+00:00 EUVD-2026-314429 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38114 fkie_cve-2025-38114 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440006+00:00

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

e1000: Move cancel_work_sync to avoid deadlock

Previously, e1000_down called cancel_work_sync for the e1000 reset task (via e1000_down_and_stop), which takes RTNL.

As reported by users and syzbot, a deadlock is possible in the following scenario:

CPU 0: - RTNL is held - e1000_close - e1000_down - cancel_work_sync (cancel / wait for e1000_reset_task())

CPU 1: - process_one_work - e1000_reset_task - take RTNL

To remedy this, avoid calling cancel_work_sync from e1000_down (e1000_reset_task does nothing if the device is down anyway). Instead, call cancel_work_sync for e1000_reset_task when the device is being removed.

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r64j-946x-g525 GHSA-r64j-946x-g525 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440042+00:00

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

e1000: Move cancel_work_sync to avoid deadlock

Previously, e1000_down called cancel_work_sync for the e1000 reset task (via e1000_down_and_stop), which takes RTNL.

As reported by users and syzbot, a deadlock is possible in the following scenario:

CPU 0: - RTNL is held - e1000_close - e1000_down - cancel_work_sync (cancel / wait for e1000_reset_task())

CPU 1: - process_one_work - e1000_reset_task - take RTNL

To remedy this, avoid calling cancel_work_sync from e1000_down (e1000_reset_task does nothing if the device is down anyway). Instead, call cancel_work_sync for e1000_reset_task when the device is being removed.

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1 openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440064+00:00

Security update for the Linux Kernel

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1 SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440432+00:00

Security update for the Linux Kernel

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38114 UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38114 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440600+00:00

Affected: Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 83 more

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: e1000: Move cancel_work_sync to avoid deadlock Previously, e1000_down called cancel_work_sync for the e1000 reset task (via e1000_down_and_stop), which takes RTNL. As reported by users and syzbot, a deadlock is possible in the following scenario: CPU 0: - RTNL is held - e1000_close - e1000_down - cancel_work_sync (cancel / wait for e1000_reset_task()) CPU 1: - process_one_work - e1000_reset_task - take RTNL To remedy this, avoid calling cancel_work_sync from e1000_down (e1000_reset_task does nothing if the device is down anyway). Instead, call cancel_work_sync for e1000_reset_task when the device is being removed.

 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1452 WID-SEC-W-2025-1452 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen 2026-10-03T22:54:40.440739+00:00

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.