<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.270230+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12130</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-12130</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382202+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-12130</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12130"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37936</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-37936</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382301+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37936"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0464</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0464 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382357+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0464</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0464"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346865</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-346865</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382389+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-346865</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346865"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37936</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-37936</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382411+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>perf/x86/intel: KVM: Mask PEBS_ENABLE loaded for guest with vCPU's value.</p>
<p>When generating the MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE value that will be loaded on
VM-Entry to a KVM guest, mask the value with the vCPU's desired PEBS_ENABLE
value.  Consulting only the host kernel's host vs. guest masks results in
running the guest with PEBS enabled even when the guest doesn't want to use
PEBS.  Because KVM uses perf events to proxy the guest virtual PMU, simply
looking at exclude_host can't differentiate between events created by host
userspace, and events created by KVM on behalf of the guest.</p>
<p>Running the guest with PEBS unexpectedly enabled typically manifests as
crashes due to a near-infinite stream of #PFs.  E.g. if the guest hasn't
written MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, the CPU will hit page faults on address '0' when
trying to record PEBS events.</p>
<p>The issue is most easily reproduced by running `perf kvm top` from before
commit 7b100989b4f6 ("perf evlist: Remove __evlist__add_default") (after
which, `perf kvm top` effectively stopped using PEBS).	The userspace side
of perf creates a guest-only PEBS event, which intel_guest_get_msrs()
misconstrues a guest-*owned* PEBS event.</p>
<p>Arguably, this is a userspace bug, as enabling PEBS on guest-only events
simply cannot work, and userspace can kill VMs in many other ways (there
is no danger to the host).  However, even if this is considered to be bad
userspace behavior, there's zero downside t…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37936"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7qvj-8m4h-6v7j</id>
    <title>GHSA-7qvj-8m4h-6v7j</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382490+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>perf/x86/intel: KVM: Mask PEBS_ENABLE loaded for guest with vCPU's value.</p>
<p>When generating the MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE value that will be loaded on
VM-Entry to a KVM guest, mask the value with the vCPU's desired PEBS_ENABLE
value.  Consulting only the host kernel's host vs. guest masks results in
running the guest with PEBS enabled even when the guest doesn't want to use
PEBS.  Because KVM uses perf events to proxy the guest virtual PMU, simply
looking at exclude_host can't differentiate between events created by host
userspace, and events created by KVM on behalf of the guest.</p>
<p>Running the guest with PEBS unexpectedly enabled typically manifests as
crashes due to a near-infinite stream of #PFs.  E.g. if the guest hasn't
written MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, the CPU will hit page faults on address '0' when
trying to record PEBS events.</p>
<p>The issue is most easily reproduced by running `perf kvm top` from before
commit 7b100989b4f6 ("perf evlist: Remove __evlist__add_default") (after
which, `perf kvm top` effectively stopped using PEBS).	The userspace side
of perf creates a guest-only PEBS event, which intel_guest_get_msrs()
misconstrues a guest-*owned* PEBS event.</p>
<p>Arguably, this is a userspace bug, as enabling PEBS on guest-only events
simply cannot work, and userspace can kill VMs in many other ways (there
is no danger to the host).  However, even if this is considered to be bad
userspace behavior, there's zero downside t…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7qvj-8m4h-6v7j"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-37936</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-37936 — perf/x86/intel: KVM: Mask PEBS_ENABLE loaded for guest with vCPU's value.</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382552+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-37936</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-37936"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1572</id>
    <title>OESA-2025-1572 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382586+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode</p>
<p>ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.</p>
<p>For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.</p>
<p>So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319</p>
<p>So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.</p>
<p>Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;apos;s definition from
&amp;apos;void&amp;apos; to &amp;apos;struct hal_srng&amp;apos;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().</p>
<p>Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1(CVE-2024-58096)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been res…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1572"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02249-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:02249-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382862+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02249-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37936</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-37936</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.382975+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 120 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/x86/intel: KVM: Mask PEBS_ENABLE loaded for guest with vCPU's value. When generating the MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE value that will be loaded on VM-Entry to a KVM guest, mask the value with the vCPU's desired PEBS_ENABLE value.  Consulting only the host kernel's host vs. guest masks results in running the guest with PEBS enabled even when the guest doesn't want to use PEBS.  Because KVM uses perf events to proxy the guest virtual PMU, simply looking at exclude_host can't differentiate between events created by host userspace, and events created by KVM on behalf of the guest. Running the guest with PEBS unexpectedly enabled typically manifests as crashes due to a near-infinite stream of #PFs.  E.g. if the guest hasn't written MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, the CPU will hit page faults on address '0' when trying to record PEBS events. The issue is most easily reproduced by running `perf kvm top` from before commit 7b100989b4f6 ("perf evlist: Remove __evlist__add_default") (after which, `perf kvm top` effectively stopped using PEBS).	The userspace side of perf creates a guest-only PEBS event, which intel_guest_get_msrs() misconstrues a guest-*owned* PEBS event. Arguably, this is a userspace bug, as enabling PEBS on guest-only events simply cannot work, and userspace can kill VMs in many other ways (there is no danger to the host).  However, even if this is considered to be bad userspace behavior, there's zero downside to per…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37936"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1114</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1114 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:10:48.383316+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1114"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
