<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:13.566363+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-09430</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-09430</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448664+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-09430</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-09430"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37864</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-37864</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448748+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-37864"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0559</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0559 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448803+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0559</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0559"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-323472</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-323472</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448834+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-323472</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-323472"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37864</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-37864</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448855+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind</p>
<p>As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa:
delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given
the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions.
As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those
assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still
present.</p>
<p>But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/
(also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit).</p>
<p>Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA
explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API
simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for
all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass
operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering().</p>
<p>Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh,
we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address
filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast,
and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the
fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as
kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick
hack.</p>
<p>It seems counter-productive to block that path by i…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-37864"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qrvm-x4ph-76fj</id>
    <title>GHSA-qrvm-x4ph-76fj</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448937+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind</p>
<p>As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa:
delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given
the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions.
As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those
assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still
present.</p>
<p>But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/
(also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit).</p>
<p>Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA
explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API
simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for
all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass
operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering().</p>
<p>Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh,
we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address
filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast,
and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the
fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as
kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick
hack.</p>
<p>It seems counter-productive to block that path by i…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qrvm-x4ph-76fj"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-37864</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-37864 — net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448976+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-37864</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-37864"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1878</id>
    <title>OESA-2025-1878 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.448996+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers</p>
<p>Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
invalidates packet pointers.</p>
<p>Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes
use of check_cfg() logic that computes &amp;apos;changes_pkt_data&amp;apos; effect for
global sub-programs, such that the following program could be
rejected:</p>
<p>int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &amp;amp;jmp_table, 0);
    	return 0;
    }</p>
<p>SEC(&amp;quot;tc&amp;quot;)
    int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	int *p = (void *)(long)sk-&amp;gt;data;
    	... make p valid ...
    	tail_call(sk);
    	*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
    	...
    }</p>
<p>The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that
can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can&amp;apos;t be freplaced with
tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.(CVE-2024-58237)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>RDMA/rxe: Fix the warning &amp;quot;__rxe_cleanup+0x12c/0x170 [rdma_rxe]&amp;quot;</p>
<p>The Call Trace is as below:
&amp;quot;
  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
  ? show_regs.cold+0x1a/0x1f
  ? __rxe_cleanup+0x12c/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
  ? __warn+0x84/0xd0
  ? __rxe_cleanup+0x12c/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
  ? report_bug+0x105/0x180
  ? han…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1878"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.449276+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2025:20081-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.449706+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:02853-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37864</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-37864</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.449942+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 114 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind As explained in many places such as commit b117e1e8a86d ("net: dsa: delete dsa_legacy_fdb_add and dsa_legacy_fdb_del"), DSA is written given the assumption that higher layers have balanced additions/deletions. As such, it only makes sense to be extremely vocal when those assumptions are violated and the driver unbinds with entries still present. But Ido Schimmel points out a very simple situation where that is wrong: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZDazSM5UsPPjQuKr@shredder/ (also briefly discussed by me in the aforementioned commit). Basically, while the bridge bypass operations are not something that DSA explicitly documents, and for the majority of DSA drivers this API simply causes them to go to promiscuous mode, that isn't the case for all drivers. Some have the necessary requirements for bridge bypass operations to do something useful - see dsa_switch_supports_uc_filtering(). Although in tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/local_termination.sh, we made an effort to popularize better mechanisms to manage address filters on DSA interfaces from user space - namely macvlan for unicast, and setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP) - through mtools - for multicast, the fact is that 'bridge fdb add ... self static local' also exists as kernel UAPI, and might be useful to someone, even if only for a quick hack. It seems counter-productive to block that path by impleme…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37864"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1114</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1114 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:08:14.450334+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1114"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
