<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:45.669400+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12166</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-12166</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623023+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-12166</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-12166"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-23145</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2025-23145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623097+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-23145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0449 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623136+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0449</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0449"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346791</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-346791</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623155+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-346791</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346791"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-23145</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2025-23145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623167+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow</p>
<p>When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req-&gt;msk is NULL.</p>
<p>Call trace:</p>
<p>mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268)
  ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207)
  ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234)
  ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254)
  ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449)
  ...</p>
<p>According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very
short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due
to multiple reasons.</p>
<p>Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they
can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The
'subflow_req-&gt;msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first,
and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here.</p>
<p>This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req-&gt;msk' under the
`own_req == true` conditional.</p>
<p>Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because
the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the
code has been moved to.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-23145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3r7x-52q9-w4pw</id>
    <title>GHSA-3r7x-52q9-w4pw</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623209+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow</p>
<p>When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req-&gt;msk is NULL.</p>
<p>Call trace:</p>
<p>mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268)
  ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207)
  ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234)
  ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254)
  ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449)
  ...</p>
<p>According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very
short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due
to multiple reasons.</p>
<p>Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they
can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The
'subflow_req-&gt;msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first,
and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here.</p>
<p>This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req-&gt;msk' under the
`own_req == true` conditional.</p>
<p>Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because
the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the
code has been moved to.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3r7x-52q9-w4pw"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-23145</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2025-23145 — mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623276+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2025-23145</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-23145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2581</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-2581 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623296+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net: mvpp2: Prevent parser TCAM memory corruption</p>
<p>Protect the parser TCAM/SRAM memory, and the cached (shadow) SRAM
information, from concurrent modifications.</p>
<p>Both the TCAM and SRAM tables are indirectly accessed by configuring
an index register that selects the row to read or write to. This means
that operations must be atomic in order to, e.g., avoid spreading
writes across multiple rows. Since the shadow SRAM array is used to
find free rows in the hardware table, it must also be protected in
order to avoid TOCTOU errors where multiple cores allocate the same
row.</p>
<p>This issue was detected in a situation where `mvpp2_set_rx_mode()` ran
concurrently on two CPUs. In this particular case the
MVPP2_PE_MAC_UC_PROMISCUOUS entry was corrupted, causing the
classifier unit to drop all incoming unicast - indicated by the
`rx_classifier_drops` counter.(CVE-2025-22060)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow</p>
<p>When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in
&amp;apos;mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow&amp;apos; because subflow_req-&amp;gt;msk is NULL.</p>
<p>Call trace:</p>
<p>mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)
  subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)
  tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)
  tcp_v4_rcv (./net/…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2581"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01614-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623718+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01614-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-23145</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-23145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.623847+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 152 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix NULL pointer in can_accept_new_subflow When testing valkey benchmark tool with MPTCP, the kernel panics in 'mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow' because subflow_req-&gt;msk is NULL. Call trace:   mptcp_can_accept_new_subflow (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:63 (discriminator 4)) (P)   subflow_syn_recv_sock (./net/mptcp/subflow.c:854)   tcp_check_req (./net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:863)   tcp_v4_rcv (./net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2268)   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207)   ip_local_deliver_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234)   ip_local_deliver (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254)   ip_rcv_finish (./net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449)   ... According to the debug log, the same req received two SYN-ACK in a very short time, very likely because the client retransmits the syn ack due to multiple reasons. Even if the packets are transmitted with a relevant time interval, they can be processed by the server on different CPUs concurrently). The 'subflow_req-&gt;msk' ownership is transferred to the subflow the first, and there will be a risk of a null pointer dereference here. This patch fixes this issue by moving the 'subflow_req-&gt;msk' under the `own_req == true` conditional. Note that the !msk check in subflow_hmac_valid() can be dropped, because the same check already exists under the own_req mpj branch where the code has been moved to.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-23145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0922</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0922 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T11:23:46.624073+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0922"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
