<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.284910+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15075</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-15075</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773094+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-15075</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-15075"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53079</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2024-53079</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773178+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-53079"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1102</id>
    <title>certfr-2024-avi-1102 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773216+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2024-avi-1102</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1102"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46449</id>
    <title>cnvd-2024-46449</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773235+00:00</updated>
    <content>cnvd-2024-46449</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-46449"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346384</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-346384</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773247+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-346384</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-346384"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53079</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-53079</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773259+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking</p>
<p>Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
"Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don't get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.</p>
<p>Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).</p>
<p>Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).</p>
<p>Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-53079"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w</id>
    <title>GHSA-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773313+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking</p>
<p>Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
"Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
don't get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin,
improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.</p>
<p>Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(),
which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(),
which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm
internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to
check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued,
which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing
callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()).</p>
<p>Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all
of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page()
will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no
longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately).</p>
<p>Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&gt;memcg_data 0
without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list;
which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depen…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4f2j-5xcx-5g9w"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53079</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2024-53079 — mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773352+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2024-53079</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-53079"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1204</id>
    <title>OESA-2025-1204 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773377+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf: Prevent tailcall infinite loop caused by freplace</p>
<p>There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a
combination of tail calls and freplace.</p>
<p>In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of
tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in
entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop:</p>
<p>entry_tc -&amp;gt; subprog_tc -&amp;gt; entry_freplace --tailcall-&amp;gt; entry_tc.</p>
<p>The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to
zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism
to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic.</p>
<p>To fix this issue, the solution is twofold:</p>
<p>1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a
   prog_array map.
2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map
   with an freplace program.</p>
<p>This ensures that:</p>
<p>* If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program,
  it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map.
* If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its
  subprograms can be extended by an freplace program.</p>
<p>Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return
-EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a
prog_array map.</p>
<p>Additionally, fix a minor code s…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1204"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4314-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2024:4314-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773534+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:4314-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53079</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53079</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773702+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 168 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does.  But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio-&gt;memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-53079"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3509 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:53:55.773920+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3509"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
