<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.041038+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01654</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-01654</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626666+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-01654</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01654"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46840</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2024-46840</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626772+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-46840"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</id>
    <title>certfr-2024-avi-0837 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626827+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2024-avi-0837</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313309</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-313309</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626864+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-313309</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313309"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46840</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-46840</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626891+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete</p>
<p>In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-46840"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-44xq-wgcc-3jwh</id>
    <title>GHSA-44xq-wgcc-3jwh</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626952+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete</p>
<p>In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-44xq-wgcc-3jwh"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</id>
    <title>ICSA-25-226-07 — Siemens Third-Party Components in SINEC OS</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.626998+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-46840</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2024-46840 — btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.629093+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2024-46840</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-46840"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2255</id>
    <title>OESA-2024-2255 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.629134+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/i915/gt: Cleanup partial engine discovery failures

If we abort driver initialisation in the middle of gt/engine discovery,
some engines will be fully setup and some not. Those incompletely setup
engines only have &amp;apos;engine-&amp;gt;release == NULL&amp;apos; and so will leak any of the
common objects allocated.

v2:
 - Drop the destroy_pinned_context() helper for now.  It&amp;apos;s not really
   worth it with just a single callsite at the moment.  (Janusz)(CVE-2022-48893)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to avoid dirent corruption

As Al reported in link[1]:

f2fs_rename()
...
	if (old_dir != new_dir &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !whiteout)
		f2fs_set_link(old_inode, old_dir_entry,
					old_dir_page, new_dir);
	else
		f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);

You want correct inumber in the &amp;quot;..&amp;quot; link.  And cross-directory
rename does move the source to new parent, even if you&amp;apos;d been asked
to leave a whiteout in the old place.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017055040.GN800259@ZenIV/

With below testcase, it may cause dirent corruption, due to it missed
to call f2fs_set_link() to update &amp;quot;..&amp;quot; link to new directory.
- mkdir -p dir/foo
- renameat2 -w dir/foo bar

[ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1421)  --&amp;gt; Bad inode number[0x4] for &amp;apos;..&amp;apos;, parent parent ino is [0…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2255"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</id>
    <title>SSA-355557 — SSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.629613+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3983-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.631615+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46840</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-46840</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.631876+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 187 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return -EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-46840"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3050</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-3050 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:20:49.632391+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-3050"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
