<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:03.782750+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01783</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-01783</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466034+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-01783</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01783"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-45025</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2024-45025</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466119+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-45025"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837</id>
    <title>certfr-2024-avi-0837 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466155+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2024-avi-0837</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0837"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-39466</id>
    <title>cnvd-2024-39466</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466175+00:00</updated>
    <content>cnvd-2024-39466</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2024-39466"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313213</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-313213</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466187+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-313213</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313213"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-45025</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-45025</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466198+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE</p>
<p>copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first
count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old-&gt;full_fds_bits[] and fill
the rest with zeroes.  What it does is copying enough words
(BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest.
That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are
clear.  Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word
we'd copied.</p>
<p>For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has
count equal to old-&gt;max_fds, so there's no open descriptors
past count, let alone fully occupied words in -&gt;open_fds[],
which is what bits in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] correspond to.</p>
<p>The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds),
which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all
opened descriptors below max_fds.  In the common case (copying on
fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below
it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable()
is safe.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that
and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] -
close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with
	* descriptor table being currently shared
	* 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table
	* 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors.
In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g.…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-45025"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7977-m9r5-5r9p</id>
    <title>GHSA-7977-m9r5-5r9p</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466247+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE</p>
<p>copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first
count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old-&gt;full_fds_bits[] and fill
the rest with zeroes.  What it does is copying enough words
(BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest.
That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are
clear.  Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word
we'd copied.</p>
<p>For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has
count equal to old-&gt;max_fds, so there's no open descriptors
past count, let alone fully occupied words in -&gt;open_fds[],
which is what bits in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] correspond to.</p>
<p>The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds),
which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all
opened descriptors below max_fds.  In the common case (copying on
fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below
it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable()
is safe.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that
and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] -
close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with
	* descriptor table being currently shared
	* 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table
	* 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors.
In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g.…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7977-m9r5-5r9p"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</id>
    <title>ICSA-25-226-07 — Siemens Third-Party Components in SINEC OS</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.466282+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-45025</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2024-45025 — fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.467245+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2024-45025</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-45025"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2181</id>
    <title>OESA-2024-2181 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.467266+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp: Use refcount_inc_not_zero() in tcp_twsk_unique().

Anderson Nascimento reported a use-after-free splat in tcp_twsk_unique()
with nice analysis.

Since commit ec94c2696f0b (&amp;quot;tcp/dccp: avoid one atomic operation for
timewait hashdance&amp;quot;), inet_twsk_hashdance() sets TIME-WAIT socket&amp;apos;s
sk_refcnt after putting it into ehash and releasing the bucket lock.

Thus, there is a small race window where other threads could try to
reuse the port during connect() and call sock_hold() in tcp_twsk_unique()
for the TIME-WAIT socket with zero refcnt.

If that happens, the refcnt taken by tcp_twsk_unique() is overwritten
and sock_put() will cause underflow, triggering a real use-after-free
somewhere else.

To avoid the use-after-free, we need to use refcount_inc_not_zero() in
tcp_twsk_unique() and give up on reusing the port if it returns false.

[0]:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1039313 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
CPU: 0 PID: 1039313 Comm: trigger Not tainted 6.8.6-200.fc39.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware20,1/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS VMW201.00V.21805430.B64.2305221830 05/22/2023
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
Code: 42 8e ff 0f 0b c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d aa 13 ea 01 00 0f 85 5e ff ff ff 48 c7 c7 f8 8e b7 82 c6 05 96 13 ea…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-2181"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</id>
    <title>SSA-355557 — SSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.467544+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2024:3983-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.468455+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:3983-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-45025</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.468582+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 187 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old-&gt;full_fds_bits[] and fill the rest with zeroes.  What it does is copying enough words (BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest. That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are clear.  Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word we'd copied. For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has count equal to old-&gt;max_fds, so there's no open descriptors past count, let alone fully occupied words in -&gt;open_fds[], which is what bits in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] correspond to. The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds), which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all opened descriptors below max_fds.  In the common case (copying on fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable() is safe. Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in -&gt;full_fds_bits[] - close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with 	* descriptor table being currently shared 	* 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table 	* 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors. In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g. spaw…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-45025"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-2124</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-2124 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T21:46:04.468818+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-2124"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
