<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.154924+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-08026</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-08026</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.163942+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-08026</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-08026"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-43887</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2024-43887</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.163993+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-43887"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1080</id>
    <title>certfr-2024-avi-1080 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoq…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164039+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2024-avi-1080</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-1080"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313156</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-313156</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164066+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-313156</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313156"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-43887</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-43887</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164085+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period</p>
<p>The lifetime of TCP-AO static_key is the same as the last
tcp_ao_info. On the socket destruction tcp_ao_info ceases to be
with RCU grace period, while tcp-ao static branch is currently deferred
destructed. The static key definition is
: DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(tcp_ao_needed, HZ);</p>
<p>which means that if RCU grace period is delayed by more than a second
and tcp_ao_needed is in the process of disablement, other CPUs may
yet see tcp_ao_info which atent dead, but soon-to-be.
And that breaks the assumption of static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled().</p>
<p>See the comment near the definition:
&gt; * The caller must make sure that the static key can't get disabled while
&gt; * in this function. It doesn't patch jump labels, only adds a user to
&gt; * an already enabled static key.</p>
<p>Originally it was introduced in commit eb8c507296f6 ("jump_label:
Prevent key-&gt;enabled int overflow"), which is needed for the atomic
contexts, one of which would be the creation of a full socket from a
request socket. In that atomic context, it's known by the presence
of the key (md5/ao) that the static branch is already enabled.
So, the ref counter for that static branch is just incremented
instead of holding the proper mutex.
static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled() is just a helper for such usage
case. But it must not be used if the static branch could get disabled
in parallel as it's not prot…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-43887"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7566-65rj-g85x</id>
    <title>GHSA-7566-65rj-g85x</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164162+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period</p>
<p>The lifetime of TCP-AO static_key is the same as the last
tcp_ao_info. On the socket destruction tcp_ao_info ceases to be
with RCU grace period, while tcp-ao static branch is currently deferred
destructed. The static key definition is
: DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(tcp_ao_needed, HZ);</p>
<p>which means that if RCU grace period is delayed by more than a second
and tcp_ao_needed is in the process of disablement, other CPUs may
yet see tcp_ao_info which atent dead, but soon-to-be.
And that breaks the assumption of static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled().</p>
<p>See the comment near the definition:
&gt; * The caller must make sure that the static key can't get disabled while
&gt; * in this function. It doesn't patch jump labels, only adds a user to
&gt; * an already enabled static key.</p>
<p>Originally it was introduced in commit eb8c507296f6 ("jump_label:
Prevent key-&gt;enabled int overflow"), which is needed for the atomic
contexts, one of which would be the creation of a full socket from a
request socket. In that atomic context, it's known by the presence
of the key (md5/ao) that the static branch is already enabled.
So, the ref counter for that static branch is just incremented
instead of holding the proper mutex.
static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled() is just a helper for such usage
case. But it must not be used if the static branch could get disabled
in parallel as it's not prot…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7566-65rj-g85x"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-43887</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-43887</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164234+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 88 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tcp: Disable TCP-AO static key after RCU grace period The lifetime of TCP-AO static_key is the same as the last tcp_ao_info. On the socket destruction tcp_ao_info ceases to be with RCU grace period, while tcp-ao static branch is currently deferred destructed. The static key definition is : DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_DEFERRED_FALSE(tcp_ao_needed, HZ); which means that if RCU grace period is delayed by more than a second and tcp_ao_needed is in the process of disablement, other CPUs may yet see tcp_ao_info which atent dead, but soon-to-be. And that breaks the assumption of static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled(). See the comment near the definition: &gt; * The caller must make sure that the static key can't get disabled while &gt; * in this function. It doesn't patch jump labels, only adds a user to &gt; * an already enabled static key. Originally it was introduced in commit eb8c507296f6 ("jump_label: Prevent key-&gt;enabled int overflow"), which is needed for the atomic contexts, one of which would be the creation of a full socket from a request socket. In that atomic context, it's known by the presence of the key (md5/ao) that the static branch is already enabled. So, the ref counter for that static branch is just incremented instead of holding the proper mutex. static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled() is just a helper for such usage case. But it must not be used if the static branch could get disabled in parallel as it's not protected…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-43887"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1927</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1927 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-10-10T21:18:52.164488+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1927"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
