<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:19.284102+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01425</id>
    <title>bdu:2025-01425</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083306+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2025-01425</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-01425"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42145</id>
    <title>BELL-CVE-2024-42145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083399+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-42145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0693</id>
    <title>certfr-2024-avi-0693 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083438+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2024-avi-0693</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2024-avi-0693"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345973</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-345973</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083457+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-345973</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-345973"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42145</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-42145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083469+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List</p>
<p>The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD
packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth.
As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate
of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading
to potential list overflow.</p>
<p>To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After
considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can
handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry
timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets
received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed
out by the time they are handled by user-space.</p>
<p>Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like
timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-42145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-45vq-73jx-ggvm</id>
    <title>GHSA-45vq-73jx-ggvm</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083504+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List</p>
<p>The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD
packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth.
As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate
of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading
to potential list overflow.</p>
<p>To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After
considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can
handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry
timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets
received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed
out by the time they are handled by user-space.</p>
<p>Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like
timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-45vq-73jx-ggvm"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07</id>
    <title>ICSA-25-226-07 — Siemens Third-Party Components in SINEC OS</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.083527+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/icsa-25-226-07"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1961</id>
    <title>OESA-2024-1961 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.084483+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX

Dan Aloni reports:
&amp;gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (&amp;quot;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to
&amp;gt; the RPC read layers&amp;quot;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up
&amp;gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.
&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size
&amp;gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset
&amp;gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server
&amp;gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as
&amp;gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.

The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all
NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a
READ.

Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed
and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent
the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to
be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.

Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These
must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit
type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks
against sb-&amp;gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.(CVE-2022-48827)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: can: j1939: enhanced error handlin…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2024-1961"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557</id>
    <title>SSA-355557 — SSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.084698+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>nfsd: NULL dereference in nfs3svc_encode_getaclres. scsi: core: use-after-free vulnerability. NFSD: vulnerability caused by loff_t overflow on the server when a client reads near the maximum offset, causing the server to return an EINVAL error, which the client retries indefinitely, instead of handling out-of-range READ requests by returning a short result with an EOF flag. NFSD: Vulnerability caused by an underflow in ia_size due to a mismatch between signed and unsigned 64-bit file size values, which can cause issues when handling large file sizes from NFS clients. NFSD: Vulnerability handling large file sizes for NFSv3 improperly capping client size values larger than s64_max, leading to unexpected behavior and potential data corruption. sh: cpuinfo: warning for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. When CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS are selected, cpu_max_bits_warn() generates a runtime warning when showing /proc/cpuinfo. A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains 
that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer 
overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application 
without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies 
to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using 
alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized 
local variables.</p>
<p>The default behavior when the stack-protector 
detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ssa-355557"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2892-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2024:2892-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.085581+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2024:2892-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42145</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-42145</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.085679+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 186 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/core: Implement a limit on UMAD receive List The existing behavior of ib_umad, which maintains received MAD packets in an unbounded list, poses a risk of uncontrolled growth. As user-space applications extract packets from this list, the rate of extraction may not match the rate of incoming packets, leading to potential list overflow. To address this, we introduce a limit to the size of the list. After considering typical scenarios, such as OpenSM processing, which can handle approximately 100k packets per second, and the 1-second retry timeout for most packets, we set the list size limit to 200k. Packets received beyond this limit are dropped, assuming they are likely timed out by the time they are handled by user-space. Notably, packets queued on the receive list due to reasons like timed-out sends are preserved even when the list is full.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-42145"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2024-1722 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T13:31:21.085892+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2024-1722"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
