<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.251752+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-244417</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-244417</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.255096+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-244417</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-244417"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-24567</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2024-24567</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.255133+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-24567"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x2c2-q32w-4w6m</id>
    <title>GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m — Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.255182+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: vyper</p>
<p>### Summary
Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin `raw_call` even if the call is a `delegatecall` or a `staticcall`. But in the context of `delegatecall` and `staticcall` the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the `value=` argument.</p>
<p>A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.</p>
<p>### Details
The IR for `raw_call` is built in the `RawCall` class:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/9136169468f317a53b4e7448389aa315f90b95ba/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L1100</p>
<p>However, the compiler doesn't validate that if either `delegatecall` or `staticall` are provided as kwargs, that `value` wasn't set. For example, the following compiles without errors:
```python
raw_call(self, call_data2, max_outsize=255, is_delegate_call=True, value=msg.value/2)
```</p>
<p>### Impact
If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. However in fact, no `value` will be sent.</p>
<p>Here is an example of an potentially problematic implementation of multicall utilizing the `raw_call` built-in:
```python
value_accumulator: uint256 = empty(uint256)
    results: DynArray[Result, max_value(uint8)] = []
    return_data: Bytes[max_value(uint8)] = b""
    success: bool = empty(bool)
    for batch in data:
        msg_value: uint256 = batch.value
        value_accumulator = unsa…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x2c2-q32w-4w6m"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-24567</id>
    <title>gsd-2024-24567</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.255287+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2024-24567</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2024-24567"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2024-151</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2024-151</title>
    <updated>2026-10-07T17:06:51.255303+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: vyper</p>
<p>Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2024-151"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
