<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-04T16:12:07.144095+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-160767</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-160767</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:12:07.248277+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-160767</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-160767"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-46132</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2023-46132</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:12:07.248316+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Hyperledger Fabric is an open source permissioned distributed ledger framework. Combining two molecules to one another, called "cross-linking" results in a molecule with a chemical formula that is composed of all atoms of the original two molecules. In Fabric, one can take a block of transactions and cross-link the transactions in a way that alters the way the peers parse the transactions. If a first peer receives a block B and a second peer receives a block identical to B but with the transactions being cross-linked, the second peer will parse transactions in a different way and thus its world state will deviate from the first peer. Orderers or peers cannot detect that a block has its transactions cross-linked, because there is a vulnerability in the way Fabric hashes the transactions of blocks. It simply and naively concatenates them, which is insecure and lets an adversary craft a "cross-linked block" (block with cross-linked transactions) which alters the way peers process transactions. For example, it is possible to select a transaction and manipulate a peer to completely avoid processing it, without changing the computed hash of the block. Additional validations have been added in v2.2.14 and v2.5.5 to detect potential cross-linking issues before processing blocks. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-46132"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v9w2-543f-h69m</id>
    <title>GHSA-v9w2-543f-h69m — Fabric vulnerable to crosslinking transaction attack</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:12:07.248360+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/hyperledger/fabric</p>
<p># Short summary</p>
<p>Combining two molecules to one another, called "cross-linking" results in a molecule with a chemical formula that is composed of all atoms of the original two molecules.</p>
<p>In Fabric, one can take a block of transactions and cross-link the transactions in a way that alters the way the peers parse the transactions. If a first peer receives a block `B` and a second peer receives a block identical to `B` but with the transactions being cross-linked, the second peer will parse transactions in a different way and thus its world state will deviate from the first peer.</p>
<p>Orderers or peers cannot detect that a block has its transactions cross-linked, because there is a vulnerability in the way Fabric hashes the transactions of blocks. It simply and naively concatenates them, which is insecure and lets an adversary craft a "cross-linked block" (block with cross-linked transactions) which alters the way peers process transactions. 
For example, it is possible to select a transaction and manipulate a peer to completely avoid processing it, without changing the computed hash of the block.</p>
<p>Additional validations have been added in v2.2.14 and v2.5.5 to detect potential cross-linking issues before processing blocks.</p>
<p>## Impact
In V1 and V2, we only have a crash fault tolerant orderer and as such, the security model Fabric operates in is that the orderer is honest,
but peers may be malicious. As such, a peer that replicates a block from a malicious peer can have a state fo…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-v9w2-543f-h69m"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-46132</id>
    <title>gsd-2023-46132</title>
    <updated>2026-10-04T16:12:07.248477+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2023-46132</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-46132"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
