<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T06:49:20.671026+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-188096</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-188096</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:49:20.675591+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-188096</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-188096"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-43635</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2023-43635</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:49:20.675624+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs</p>
<p>The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism.</p>
<p>Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique
value for each PCR entry.</p>
<p>These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to
encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory.</p>
<p>This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should
be protected.</p>
<p>This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism,
designed to protect said “vault”.</p>
<p>The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that
SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being
checked.</p>
<p>The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs.
This leads to several issues:</p>
<p>• Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well
as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker.</p>
<p>• SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the
key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled.</p>
<p>An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render
the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-43635"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jvr-vj2c-8q37</id>
    <title>GHSA-4jvr-vj2c-8q37 — EVE Seals Vault Key With SHA1 PCRs</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:49:20.675678+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: github.com/lf-edge/eve</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>The vault key is sealed using SHA1 PCRs instead of SHA256 PCRs</p>
<p>Thus an attacker with physical access to an EVE-OS device can try to brute force creating a kernel or rootfs image which produces the same SHA1 PCR but with malicious content.</p>
<p>### Patches</p>
<p>Fixed in 9.4.3-lts and 10.1.0</p>
<p>### Workarounds</p>
<p>None</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4jvr-vj2c-8q37"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-43635</id>
    <title>gsd-2023-43635</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:49:20.675707+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2023-43635</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-43635"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
