<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T20:36:08.344148+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-207182</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-207182</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T20:36:08.408141+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-207182</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-207182"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-34459</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2023-34459</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T20:36:08.408193+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Starting in version 4.7.0 and prior to version 4.9.2, when the `verifyMultiProof`, `verifyMultiProofCalldata`, `procesprocessMultiProof`, or `processMultiProofCalldat` functions are in use, it is possible to construct merkle trees that allow forging a valid multiproof for an arbitrary set of leaves.</p>
<p>A contract may be vulnerable if it uses multiproofs for verification and the merkle tree that is processed includes a node with value 0 at depth 1 (just under the root). This could happen inadvertedly for balanced trees with 3 leaves or less, if the leaves are not hashed. This could happen deliberately if a malicious tree builder includes such a node in the tree.</p>
<p>A contract is not vulnerable if it uses single-leaf proving (`verify`, `verifyCalldata`, `processProof`, or `processProofCalldata`), or if it uses multiproofs with a known tree that has hashed leaves. Standard merkle trees produced or validated with the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree library are safe.</p>
<p>The problem has been patched in version 4.9.2.</p>
<p>Some workarounds are available. For those using multiproofs: When constructing merkle trees hash the leaves and do not insert empty nodes in your trees. Using the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree package eliminates this issue. Do not accept user-provided merkle roots without reconstructing at least the first level of the tree. Verify the merkle tree structure by reconstructing it from the leaves.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2023-34459"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wprv-93r4-jj2p</id>
    <title>GHSA-wprv-93r4-jj2p — OpenZeppelin Contracts using MerkleProof multiproofs may allow proving arbitrary leaves for specific trees</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T20:36:08.408240+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: @openzeppelin/contracts, npm: @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable</p>
<p>### Impact</p>
<p>When the `verifyMultiProof`, `verifyMultiProofCalldata`, `processMultiProof`, or `processMultiProofCalldata` functions are in use, it is possible to construct merkle trees that allow forging a valid multiproof for an arbitrary set of leaves.</p>
<p>A contract may be vulnerable if it uses multiproofs for verification and the merkle tree that is processed includes a node with value 0 at depth 1 (just under the root). This could happen inadvertently for balanced trees with 3 leaves or less, if the leaves are not hashed. This could happen deliberately if a malicious tree builder includes such a node in the tree.</p>
<p>A contract is not vulnerable if it uses single-leaf proving (`verify`, `verifyCalldata`, `processProof`, or `processProofCalldata`), or if it uses multiproofs with a known tree that has hashed leaves. Standard merkle trees produced or validated with the [@openzeppelin/merkle-tree](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/merkle-tree) library are safe.</p>
<p>### Patches</p>
<p>The problem has been patched in 4.9.2.</p>
<p>### Workarounds</p>
<p>If you are using multiproofs: When constructing merkle trees hash the leaves and do not insert empty nodes in your trees. Using the [@openzeppelin/merkle-tree](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openzeppelin/merkle-tree) package eliminates this issue. Do not accept user-provided merkle roots without reconstructing at least the first level of the tree. Verify the merkle tree structure by reconstructing it from the leaves.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wprv-93r4-jj2p"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-34459</id>
    <title>gsd-2023-34459</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T20:36:08.408288+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2023-34459</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2023-34459"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
