<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.005398+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02633</id>
    <title>bdu:2026-02633</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.300867+00:00</updated>
    <content>bdu:2026-02633</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-02633"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0509</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0509 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.300928+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0509</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0509"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310793</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-310793</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.300949+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-310793</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310793"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49769</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2022-49769</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.300961+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock</p>
<p>Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it's the expected value.</p>
<p>Tested with:</p>
<p>mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
    for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
        gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
        mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test &amp;&amp; umount /mnt/test
    done</p>
<p>Before this patch we get a withdraw after</p>
<p>[   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492</p>
<p>and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like</p>
<p>[   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'</p>
<p>After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49769"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-22ff-fvm7-6wj7</id>
    <title>GHSA-22ff-fvm7-6wj7</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.301009+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock</p>
<p>Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it's the expected value.</p>
<p>Tested with:</p>
<p>mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
    for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
        gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
        mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test &amp;&amp; umount /mnt/test
    done</p>
<p>Before this patch we get a withdraw after</p>
<p>[   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492</p>
<p>and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like</p>
<p>[   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'</p>
<p>After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-22ff-fvm7-6wj7"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1569</id>
    <title>OESA-2025-1569 — kernel security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.301039+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4: kernel</p>
<p>The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock</p>
<p>Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it&amp;apos;s very
unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it
should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to
bad calculations. It&amp;apos;s always a fixed value based on the block size so
we can just check that it&amp;apos;s the expected value.</p>
<p>Tested with:</p>
<p>mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb
    for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do
        gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb
        mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test &amp;amp;&amp;amp; umount /mnt/test
    done</p>
<p>Before this patch we get a withdraw after</p>
<p>[   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block
[   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4)
[   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492</p>
<p>and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like</p>
<p>[   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19
[   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type &amp;apos;long unsigned int&amp;apos;</p>
<p>After the patch, these complaints don&amp;apos;t appear, mount fails immediately
and we get an explanation in dmesg.(CVE-2022-49769)</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>misc/vmw_vmci: fix an infoleak in vmci_host_do_receive_datagram()</p>
<p>`s…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2025-1569"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01918-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:01918-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.301137+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:01918-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49769</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49769</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:35:26.301252+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux and 149 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so we can just check that it's the expected value. Tested with:     mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb     for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do         gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb         mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test &amp;&amp; umount /mnt/test     done Before this patch we get a withdraw after [   76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block [   76.413681]   bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4) [   76.413681]   function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492 and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like [   76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19 [   76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately and we get an explanation in dmesg.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49769"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
