<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.276191+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307</id>
    <title>certfr-2025-avi-0307 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un at…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.589548+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2025-avi-0307</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0307"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310536</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-310536</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.589631+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-310536</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-310536"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49406</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2022-49406</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.589659+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()</p>
<p>When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:</p>
<p>[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***</p>
<p>Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-49406"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x74c-mr6j-xgx9</id>
    <title>GHSA-x74c-mr6j-xgx9</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.589723+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show()</p>
<p>When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal
with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs
lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs
lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the
disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the
device is removed:</p>
<p>[  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  760.703551]
[  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  760.703556]        ----                    ----
[  760.703558]   lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&gt;active#385);
[  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock);
[  760.703579]   lock(kn-&gt;active#385);
[  760.703587]
[  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK ***</p>
<p>Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from
blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x74c-mr6j-xgx9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2025:1176-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.589766+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for the Linux Kernel</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2025:1176-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49406</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2022-49406</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T10:22:43.590265+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 69 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Fix potential deadlock in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show() When being read, a sysfs attribute is already protected against removal with the kobject node active reference counter. As a result, in blk_ia_range_sysfs_show(), there is no need to take the queue sysfs lock when reading the value of a range attribute. Using the queue sysfs lock in this function creates a potential deadlock situation with the disk removal, something that a lockdep signals with a splat when the device is removed: [  760.703551]  Possible unsafe locking scenario: [  760.703551] [  760.703554]        CPU0                    CPU1 [  760.703556]        ----                    ---- [  760.703558]   lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703565]                                lock(kn-&gt;active#385); [  760.703573]                                lock(&amp;q-&gt;sysfs_lock); [  760.703579]   lock(kn-&gt;active#385); [  760.703587] [  760.703587]  *** DEADLOCK *** Solve this by removing the mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() calls from blk_ia_range_sysfs_show().</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2022-49406"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
