<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:14.862929+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2017-10817</id>
    <title>cnvd-2017-10817</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218688+00:00</updated>
    <content>cnvd-2017-10817</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2017-10817"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-74553</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-74553</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218740+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-74553</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-74553"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2017-7233</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2017-7233</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218755+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2017-7233"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-37hp-765x-j95x</id>
    <title>GHSA-37hp-765x-j95x — Django open redirect and possible XSS attack via user-supplied numeric redirect URLs</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218790+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: Django</p>
<p>Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-37hp-765x-j95x"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2017-7233</id>
    <title>gsd-2017-7233</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218819+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2017-7233</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2017-7233"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2018:0632-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2018:0632-1 — Security update for python-Django</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218831+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for python-Django</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2018:0632-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2017-9</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2017-9</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218851+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p>
<p>Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2017-9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2017:1445</id>
    <title>RHSA-2017:1445 — Red Hat Security Advisory: python-django security update</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218872+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>python-django: Open redirect and possible XSS attack via user-supplied numeric redirect URLs</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2017:1445"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2018:0973-1</id>
    <title>SUSE-SU-2018:0973-1 — Security update for python-Django</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218888+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Security update for python-Django</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2018:0973-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2017-7233</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2017-7233</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T21:42:15.218904+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:14.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: python-django</p>
<p>Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2017-7233"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
