<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.029439+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>csirt@opendfir.org</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-175960</id>
    <title>EUVD-2026-175960</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.114740+00:00</updated>
    <content>EUVD-2026-175960</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-175960"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2012-6661</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2012-6661</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.114789+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors.  NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2).</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2012-6661"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-48vv-2pmq-9fvv</id>
    <title>GHSA-48vv-2pmq-9fvv — Plone and Zope2 do not reseed pseudo-random number generator</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.114838+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: Zope2, PyPI: Plone</p>
<p>Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors.  NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2).</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-48vv-2pmq-9fvv"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2012-6661</id>
    <title>gsd-2012-6661</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.114895+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2012-6661</content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2012-6661"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2014-51</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2014-51</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T06:05:22.114920+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: plone</p>
<p>Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors.  NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2).</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2014-51"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
