Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-93

Allowed

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.

433 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-JWPW-Q68H-R678

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:47 – Updated: 2023-10-05 17:32
Withdrawn 2023-10-05 VLAI
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in dio
Details

Duplicate advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-9324-jv53-9cc8. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

The dio package prior to 5.0.0 for Dart allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP method string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2020-35669.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Pub",
        "name": "dio"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-74",
      "CWE-88",
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-09-15T03:27:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-04-15T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Duplicate advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-9324-jv53-9cc8. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nThe dio package prior to 5.0.0 for Dart allows CRLF injection if the attacker controls the HTTP method string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2020-35669.",
  "id": "GHSA-jwpw-q68h-r678",
  "modified": "2023-10-05T17:32:48Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:47:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31402"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cfug/dio/issues/1130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cfug/dio/commit/927f79e93ba39f3c3a12c190624a55653d577984"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/cfug/dio"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/GHSA-jwpw-q68h-r678"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in dio",
  "withdrawn": "2023-10-05T17:32:48Z"
}

GHSA-JX6G-363C-PPRR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-17 12:30 – Updated: 2026-03-17 12:30
VLAI
Details

A flaw was found in libsoup. An attacker controlling the value used to set the Content-Type header can inject a Carriage Return Line Feed (CRLF) sequence due to improper input sanitization in the soup_message_headers_set_content_type() function. This vulnerability allows for the injection of arbitrary header-value pairs, potentially leading to HTTP header injection and response splitting attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-3634"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-17T10:16:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A flaw was found in libsoup. An attacker controlling the value used to set the Content-Type header can inject a Carriage Return Line Feed (CRLF) sequence due to improper input sanitization in the `soup_message_headers_set_content_type()` function. This vulnerability allows for the injection of arbitrary header-value pairs, potentially leading to HTTP header injection and response splitting attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-jx6g-363c-pprr",
  "modified": "2026-03-17T12:30:19Z",
  "published": "2026-03-17T12:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3634"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3634"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445129"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/485"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M4J5-5X4R-2XP9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-17 20:24 – Updated: 2025-09-17 20:24
VLAI
Summary
Keycloak SMTP Inject Vulnerability
Details

Special characters used during e-mail registration may perform SMTP Injection and unexpectedly send short unwanted e-mails. The email is limited to 64 characters (limited local part of the email), so the attack is limited to very shorts emails (subject and little data, the example is 60 chars). This flaw's only direct consequence is an unsolicited email being sent from the Keycloak server. However, this action could be a precursor for more sophisticated attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "26.2.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "26.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "26.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-8419"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-17T20:24:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Special characters used during e-mail registration may perform SMTP Injection and unexpectedly send short unwanted e-mails. The email is limited to 64 characters (limited local part of the email), so the attack is limited to very shorts emails (subject and little data, the example is 60 chars). This flaw\u0027s only direct consequence is an unsolicited email being sent from the Keycloak server. However, this action could be a precursor for more sophisticated attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4j5-5x4r-2xp9",
  "modified": "2025-09-17T20:24:07Z",
  "published": "2025-09-17T20:24:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-m4j5-5x4r-2xp9"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8419"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15336"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15337"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8419"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385776"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak SMTP Inject Vulnerability"
}

GHSA-M6QW-4CW2-HM4M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 20:07 – Updated: 2026-06-15 20:07
VLAI
Summary
aiohttp: CRLF injection in multipart headers
Details

Summary

Attacker-controlled input included into multipart/payload headers can be used to modify a request to inject additional headers or similar.

Impact

In the unlikely situation that an application is passing user-controlled strings into MultipartWriter.append(headers=...) or Payload.headers, then an attacker may be able to modify the request to inject headers or change the contents of the request.

Workaround

Sanitise such user input.


Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/bf88077ebb14f4c29924b8e8904cba20c55c28b8

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.13.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "aiohttp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.14.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-50269"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-113",
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:07:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nAttacker-controlled input included into multipart/payload headers can be used to modify a request to inject additional headers or similar.\n\n### Impact\n\nIn the unlikely situation that an application is passing user-controlled strings into `MultipartWriter.append(headers=...)` or `Payload.headers`, then an attacker may be able to modify the request to inject headers or change the contents of the request.\n\n### Workaround\n\nSanitise such user input.\n\n-----\n\nPatch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/bf88077ebb14f4c29924b8e8904cba20c55c28b8",
  "id": "GHSA-m6qw-4cw2-hm4m",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T20:07:26Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:07:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/security/advisories/GHSA-m6qw-4cw2-hm4m"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/bf88077ebb14f4c29924b8e8904cba20c55c28b8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "aiohttp: CRLF injection in multipart headers"
}

GHSA-M7VJ-MCJG-2MX3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-08 18:31 – Updated: 2025-07-08 18:31
VLAI
Details

CLRF injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.8 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin rights to write to a protected configuration file on disk.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-0293"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-08T16:15:51Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "CLRF injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.8 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin rights to write to a protected configuration file on disk.",
  "id": "GHSA-m7vj-mcjg-2mx3",
  "modified": "2025-07-08T18:31:43Z",
  "published": "2025-07-08T18:31:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0293"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://forums.ivanti.com/s/article/July-Security-Advisory-Ivanti-Connect-Secure-and-Ivanti-Policy-Secure-Multiple-CVEs"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M8RV-5G2X-5CG5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-03 19:33 – Updated: 2026-08-03 19:33
VLAI
Summary
undici vulnerable to CRLF Injection via blob-like body 'type' property
Details

Impact

When an application passes a duck-typed blob-like body to undici's HTTP/1.1 dispatcher (via request(), stream(), pipeline(), or dispatch()) with a .type derived from untrusted input, an attacker can inject CRLF sequences (\r\n) to append arbitrary HTTP headers and potentially smuggle a second request past the upstream.

The vulnerable branch in lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js pushes body.type directly into the outgoing headers with no validation, while every other header path in undici goes through isValidHeaderValue():

} else if (util.isBlobLike(body) && request.contentType == null && body.type) {
  headers.push('content-type', body.type)  // bypasses isValidHeaderValue()
}

The bug requires a hand-rolled duck-typed blob object or a Blob subclass with a controlled .type. Native Blob is safe because its constructor strips CRLF from .type. fetch() is unaffected because it validates via the Headers class. Ecosystem consumers that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input include form-data-encoder, formdata-polyfill, and formdata-node.

Same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 (explicit content-type sink, fixed in undici 5.8.2) and CVE-2026-1527 (upgrade option sink, fixed in 6.24.0 / 7.24.0), both closed by adding isValidHeaderValue() on their respective sinks. This branch was missed.

Patches

Patched in undici v6.28.0, v7.29.0, and v8.9.0. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later.

Workarounds

  • Set an explicit, validated content-type header on the request options (skips the vulnerable branch).
  • Use a native Blob (or fetch-blob) instead of a hand-rolled duck-typed object.
  • Reject control characters in the MIME type before assigning it to .type.
  • Use fetch() instead of the non-fetch APIs.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "undici"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.28.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "undici"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.29.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "undici"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "8.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.9.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-15157"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-03T19:33:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-29T22:16:52Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nWhen an application passes a duck-typed blob-like body to undici\u0027s HTTP/1.1 dispatcher (via `request()`, `stream()`, `pipeline()`, or `dispatch()`) with a `.type` derived from untrusted input, an attacker can inject CRLF sequences (`\\r\\n`) to append arbitrary HTTP headers and potentially smuggle a second request past the upstream.\n\nThe vulnerable branch in `lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js` pushes `body.type` directly into the outgoing headers with no validation, while every other header path in undici goes through `isValidHeaderValue()`:\n\n```javascript\n} else if (util.isBlobLike(body) \u0026\u0026 request.contentType == null \u0026\u0026 body.type) {\n  headers.push(\u0027content-type\u0027, body.type)  // bypasses isValidHeaderValue()\n}\n```\n\nThe bug requires a hand-rolled duck-typed blob object or a Blob subclass with a controlled `.type`. Native `Blob` is safe because its constructor strips CRLF from `.type`. `fetch()` is unaffected because it validates via the `Headers` class. Ecosystem consumers that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input include `form-data-encoder`, `formdata-polyfill`, and `formdata-node`.\n\nSame defect class as `CVE-2022-35948` (explicit `content-type` sink, fixed in undici 5.8.2) and `CVE-2026-1527` (`upgrade` option sink, fixed in 6.24.0 / 7.24.0), both closed by adding `isValidHeaderValue()` on their respective sinks. This branch was missed.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in undici v6.28.0, v7.29.0, and v8.9.0. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Set an explicit, validated `content-type` header on the request options (skips the vulnerable branch).\n- Use a native `Blob` (or `fetch-blob`) instead of a hand-rolled duck-typed object.\n- Reject control characters in the MIME type before assigning it to `.type`.\n- Use `fetch()` instead of the non-`fetch` APIs.",
  "id": "GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5",
  "modified": "2026-08-03T19:33:53Z",
  "published": "2026-08-03T19:33:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15157"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/33928bc24f742ea8422ed90d17f2e0cc83e4d09d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/740a0b7c173cb4a83a5b693e96e8f3a116cfc400"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/7d3cf924c262c486bc77f951348f4e5c847b7b42"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v6.28.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v7.29.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v8.9.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "undici vulnerable to CRLF Injection via blob-like body \u0027type\u0027 property"
}

GHSA-M93C-CH8C-Q8CJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-10 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-19 18:32
VLAI
Details

Metrics::Any::Adapter::DogStatsd versions before 0.04 for Perl does not protect against metric injections.

The statsd protocol (and extensions such as dogstatsd) allow mutiple metrics,separated by newlines, to be sent per packet.

Metrics::Any::Adapter::DogStatsd which extends Metrics::Any::Adapter::Statsd, which has a similar vulnerability.

In addition, the _tags function does not check tags for newlines or statsd control characters. The tags can be used for metric injections.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-50638"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T19:16:37Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Metrics::Any::Adapter::DogStatsd versions before 0.04 for Perl does not protect against metric injections.\n\nThe statsd protocol (and extensions such as dogstatsd) allow mutiple metrics,separated by newlines, to be sent per packet.\n\nMetrics::Any::Adapter::DogStatsd which extends Metrics::Any::Adapter::Statsd, which has a similar vulnerability.\n\nIn addition, the _tags function does not check tags for newlines or statsd control characters. The tags can be used for metric injections.",
  "id": "GHSA-m93c-ch8c-q8cj",
  "modified": "2026-06-19T18:32:31Z",
  "published": "2026-06-10T21:31:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50638"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://metacpan.org/release/PEVANS/Metrics-Any-Adapter-Statsd-0.04/changes"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50637"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50639"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9270"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M9G3-3G99-MHPX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 20:49 – Updated: 2026-06-08 23:29
VLAI
Summary
eventsource-encoder vulnerable to SSE event injection via unsanitized `event` and `id` fields
Details

Summary

eventsource-encoder does not sanitize the event or id fields of an EventSourceMessage before serializing them. An attacker who controls either field can inject arbitrary Server-Sent Events line terminators (\n, \r, or \r\n) and thereby forge additional SSE fields or entire messages on the stream. This is similar in spirit to GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385 (h3), but the vulnerable fields are event/id rather than data/comment. These are less likely to be user-controllable, but should still be sanitized.

Details

In src/encode.ts, encodeMessage interpolates event and id into the output without inspecting them for line terminators:

if (message.event) {
  output += `event: ${message.event}\n`
}
// ...
if (typeof message.id === 'string' || typeof message.id === 'number') {
  output += `id: ${message.id}\n`
}

The SSE specification treats \r, \n, and \r\n as line terminators. A \n (or \r) embedded in either field is rendered as the end of that field, allowing the rest of the input to be interpreted by the client as new SSE fields.

By contrast, data and comment already normalize all three line-terminator forms via NEWLINES_RE = /(\r\n|\r|\n)/g, so they are not affected.

Proof of concept

import {encode} from 'eventsource-encoder'

// Attacker-controlled value flows into `event`
const userSuppliedTopic = 'message\nevent: admin\ndata: {"role":"admin"}'

console.log(encode({event: userSuppliedTopic, data: 'hello'}))

Output:

event: message
event: admin
data: {"role":"admin"}
data: hello

The browser sees two events: a forged admin event with attacker-chosen payload, followed by the legitimate message event. The same primitive works through id for any string id value.

Impact

If untrusted input is passed into the event or id field of a message, an attacker can:

  • Spoof events of arbitrary type (rerouting payloads to handlers the attacker chooses)
  • Inject additional SSE fields (data:, id:, retry:) into the stream
  • Split a single encode() call into multiple distinct browser events
  • Override the client's Last-Event-ID via injected id: lines

The vulnerability requires that an application places attacker-controlled data into event or id. Applications that only put trusted, statically-defined values into these fields are not affected.

Patches

Fixed in eventsource-encoder@1.0.2. The event and string id fields are now validated; any value containing \r or \n causes the encoder to throw a TypeError rather than emit a malformed stream.

Workarounds

If users cannot upgrade, validate or strip line terminators from any untrusted value before passing it to encode / encodeMessage:

function safeSingleLine(value) {
  if (/[\r\n]/.test(value)) throw new Error('SSE field must be single-line')
  return value
}

encode({event: safeSingleLine(topic), id: safeSingleLine(id), data})

Resources

  • Related advisory (different package, same class): https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385
  • SSE spec, line terminators: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/server-sent-events.html#parsing-an-event-stream

Credit

Discovered while reviewing in light of GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.0.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "eventsource-encoder"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44214"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-113",
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T20:49:40Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-26T20:16:19Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`eventsource-encoder` does not sanitize the `event` or `id` fields of an `EventSourceMessage` before serializing them. An attacker who controls either field can inject arbitrary Server-Sent Events line terminators (`\\n`, `\\r`, or `\\r\\n`) and thereby forge additional SSE fields or entire messages on the stream. This is similar in spirit to [GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385) (h3), but the vulnerable fields are `event`/`id` rather than `data`/`comment`. These are less likely to be user-controllable, but should still be sanitized.\n\n### Details\n\nIn `src/encode.ts`, `encodeMessage` interpolates `event` and `id` into the output without inspecting them for line terminators:\n\n```ts\nif (message.event) {\n  output += `event: ${message.event}\\n`\n}\n// ...\nif (typeof message.id === \u0027string\u0027 || typeof message.id === \u0027number\u0027) {\n  output += `id: ${message.id}\\n`\n}\n```\n\nThe SSE specification treats `\\r`, `\\n`, and `\\r\\n` as line terminators. A `\\n` (or `\\r`) embedded in either field is rendered as the end of that field, allowing the rest of the input to be interpreted by the client as new SSE fields.\n\nBy contrast, `data` and `comment` already normalize all three line-terminator forms via `NEWLINES_RE = /(\\r\\n|\\r|\\n)/g`, so they are not affected.\n\n### Proof of concept\n\n```js\nimport {encode} from \u0027eventsource-encoder\u0027\n\n// Attacker-controlled value flows into `event`\nconst userSuppliedTopic = \u0027message\\nevent: admin\\ndata: {\"role\":\"admin\"}\u0027\n\nconsole.log(encode({event: userSuppliedTopic, data: \u0027hello\u0027}))\n```\n\nOutput:\n\n```\nevent: message\nevent: admin\ndata: {\"role\":\"admin\"}\ndata: hello\n\n```\n\nThe browser sees two events: a forged `admin` event with attacker-chosen payload, followed by the legitimate `message` event. The same primitive works through `id` for any string id value.\n\n### Impact\n\nIf untrusted input is passed into the `event` or `id` field of a message, an attacker can:\n\n- Spoof events of arbitrary type (rerouting payloads to handlers the attacker chooses)\n- Inject additional SSE fields (`data:`, `id:`, `retry:`) into the stream\n- Split a single `encode()` call into multiple distinct browser events\n- Override the client\u0027s `Last-Event-ID` via injected `id:` lines\n\nThe vulnerability requires that an application places attacker-controlled data into `event` or `id`. Applications that only put trusted, statically-defined values into these fields are not affected.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in `eventsource-encoder@1.0.2`. The `event` and string `id` fields are now validated; any value containing `\\r` or `\\n` causes the encoder to throw a `TypeError` rather than emit a malformed stream.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf users cannot upgrade, validate or strip line terminators from any untrusted value before passing it to `encode` / `encodeMessage`:\n\n```js\nfunction safeSingleLine(value) {\n  if (/[\\r\\n]/.test(value)) throw new Error(\u0027SSE field must be single-line\u0027)\n  return value\n}\n\nencode({event: safeSingleLine(topic), id: safeSingleLine(id), data})\n```\n\n### Resources\n\n- Related advisory (different package, same class): https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385\n- SSE spec, line terminators: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/server-sent-events.html#parsing-an-event-stream\n\n### Credit\n\nDiscovered while reviewing in light of GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385.",
  "id": "GHSA-m9g3-3g99-mhpx",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T23:29:22Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T20:49:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rexxars/eventsource-encoder/security/advisories/GHSA-m9g3-3g99-mhpx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44214"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rexxars/eventsource-encoder"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/server-sent-events.html#parsing-an-event-stream"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "eventsource-encoder vulnerable to SSE event injection via unsanitized `event` and `id` fields"
}

GHSA-MCVM-9XXC-24JX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-04 18:30 – Updated: 2026-06-04 21:31
VLAI
Details

Etsy::StatsD versions through 1.002002 for Perl allow metric injections.

The metric names and values are not checked for newlines, colons or pipes. Metrics generated from untrusted sources could inject additional statsd metrics.

Note that the git repository contains an unreleased version with the gauge and set methods that also do not check for potential metric injections.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46741"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T17:16:32Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Etsy::StatsD versions through 1.002002 for Perl allow metric injections.\n\nThe metric names and values are not checked for newlines, colons or pipes. Metrics generated from untrusted sources could inject additional statsd metrics.\n\nNote that the git repository contains an unreleased version with the gauge and set methods that also do not check for potential metric injections.",
  "id": "GHSA-mcvm-9xxc-24jx",
  "modified": "2026-06-04T21:31:21Z",
  "published": "2026-06-04T18:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46741"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46720"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-MG2V-V6XC-R2VV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-21 15:31 – Updated: 2026-09-21 15:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was determined in ST Engineering iDirect Evolution and Velocity WebServer Evolution up to 20260717. This vulnerability affects the function authorize of the file /usr/sbin/webserver of the component HTTP Header Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument Success can lead to open redirect. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-94216"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-601",
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-21T13:17:12Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was determined in ST Engineering iDirect Evolution and Velocity WebServer Evolution up to 20260717. This vulnerability affects the function authorize of the file /usr/sbin/webserver of the component HTTP Header Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument Success can lead to open redirect. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-mg2v-v6xc-r2vv",
  "modified": "2026-09-21T15:31:59Z",
  "published": "2026-09-21T15:31:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-94216"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dxz0069/WAVLINK-WN530H4-Command-Injection-in-set_add_routing/blob/main/IDIRECT-WEBSERVER-CRLF-OPENREDIRECT-001-vulndb.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-94216"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/894247"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/408071"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/408071/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Implementation

Avoid using CRLF as a special sequence.

Mitigation
Implementation

Appropriately filter or quote CRLF sequences in user-controlled input.

CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters

An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.

CAPEC-81: Web Server Logs Tampering

Web Logs Tampering attacks involve an attacker injecting, deleting or otherwise tampering with the contents of web logs typically for the purposes of masking other malicious behavior. Additionally, writing malicious data to log files may target jobs, filters, reports, and other agents that process the logs in an asynchronous attack pattern. This pattern of attack is similar to "Log Injection-Tampering-Forging" except that in this case, the attack is targeting the logs of the web server and not the application.