CWE-918
AllowedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
6243 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-VH2W-9GGJ-CCRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-14 06:30 – Updated: 2023-03-21 18:30In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Services) - versions 420, 430, an attacker can control a malicious BOE server, forcing the application server to connect to its own admintools, leading to a high impact on availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-27271"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-14T06:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Services) - versions 420, 430, an attacker can control a malicious BOE server, forcing the application server to connect to its own admintools, leading to a high impact on availability.",
"id": "GHSA-vh2w-9ggj-ccrm",
"modified": "2023-03-21T18:30:20Z",
"published": "2023-03-14T06:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/3287120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sap.com/documents/2022/02/fa865ea4-167e-0010-bca6-c68f7e60039b.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VH5M-R6VP-RXJG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-21 18:34 – Updated: 2026-08-21 18:34OpenViking before 0.3.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to access internal network services by submitting arbitrary URLs to the resources API endpoint. Attackers can POST a crafted URL to /api/v1/resources, causing the server to issue outbound HEAD and GET requests with redirects enabled to loopback, RFC 1918, link-local, or cloud metadata addresses, then read back responses through normal content APIs to enumerate and interact with internal services.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-22681"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-21T16:17:16Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "OpenViking before 0.3.4\u00a0contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to access internal network services by submitting arbitrary URLs to the resources API endpoint. Attackers can POST a crafted URL to /api/v1/resources, causing the server to issue outbound HEAD and GET requests with redirects enabled to loopback, RFC 1918, link-local, or cloud metadata addresses, then read back responses through normal content APIs to enumerate and interact with internal services.",
"id": "GHSA-vh5m-r6vp-rxjg",
"modified": "2026-08-21T18:34:56Z",
"published": "2026-08-21T18:34:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22681"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/volcengine/OpenViking/pull/1133"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/volcengine/OpenViking/pull/1133https://github.com/volcengine/OpenViking/pull/1133"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/volcengine/OpenViking/commit/41e345896d247e43ab78bbcb38b4a5b1b38ef62c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/volcengine/OpenViking/releases/tag/v0.3.4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openviking-ssrf-via-api-v1-resources"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-VH6P-P447-HRRR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-18 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-26 00:01Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1723"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-17T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.6.",
"id": "GHSA-vh6p-p447-hrrr",
"modified": "2022-05-26T00:01:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-18T00:00:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1723"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jgraph/drawio/commit/7a68ebe22a64fe722704e9c4527791209fee2034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/619851a4-2a08-4196-80e9-ab41953491d8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VH75-FWV3-PQRH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 19:52 – Updated: 2026-05-13 16:26The SSRF protection in requests-hardened prior to version 1.2.1 fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space (100.64.0.0/10). An attacker who can supply arbitrary URLs to requests-hardened could exploit this gap to access internal services hosted within 100.64.0.0/10. This is for example relevant in environments such as AWS EKS where 100.64.0.0/10 is commonly used as the default pod CIDR.
The impact is environment-dependent, deployments that utilize the affected CIDR range for internal networking are exposed to SSRF bypass, while others may not be affected.
The issue is resolved in version 1.2.1 by extending the IP filtering logic to explicitly block the RFC 6598 range in addition to standard private addresses, as well as blocking all other reserved addresses (such as multicast) to prevent the re-occurrence of similar issues.
Version 1.2.1 is now blocking the following CIDRs:
192.88.99.0/24- 6to4 relay anycast100.64.0.0/10- CG-NAT5f00::/16- IPv6 Segment Routing64:ff9b::/96- used for IPv6 & IPv4 translation (NAT64)2001:20::/28- ORCHIDv2 (overlay identifiers)224.0.0.0/4- multicastff00::/8- multicast
Resources
- https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/119812
- https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/b7403f88d3b3689e57435b75b51691a160aaeef5 - the fix itself
- https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/a266b3958bb142bca515b3c230fdea19fbda327c - follow up, adding additional support for outdated Python versions (
3.11.9and3.10.11instead of only3.11.15and3.10.20) - https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/releases/tag/v1.2.1
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "requests-hardened"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42175"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T19:52:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T18:17:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The SSRF protection in `requests-hardened` prior to version 1.2.1 fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space (`100.64.0.0/10`). An attacker who can supply arbitrary URLs to `requests-hardened` could exploit this gap to access internal services hosted within `100.64.0.0/10`. This is for example relevant in environments such as AWS EKS where `100.64.0.0/10` is commonly used as the default pod CIDR.\n\nThe impact is environment-dependent, deployments that utilize the affected CIDR range for internal networking are exposed to SSRF bypass, while others may not be affected.\n\nThe issue is resolved in version 1.2.1 by extending the IP filtering logic to explicitly block the RFC 6598 range in addition to standard private addresses, as well as blocking all other reserved addresses (such as multicast) to prevent the re-occurrence of similar issues.\n\nVersion 1.2.1 is now blocking the following CIDRs:\n\n- `192.88.99.0/24` - 6to4 relay anycast\n- `100.64.0.0/10` - CG-NAT\n- `5f00::/16` - IPv6 Segment Routing\n- `64:ff9b::/96` - used for IPv6 \u0026 IPv4 translation (NAT64)\n- `2001:20::/28` - ORCHIDv2 (overlay identifiers)\n- `224.0.0.0/4` - multicast\n- `ff00::/8` - multicast\n\n## Resources\n\n- https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/119812\n- https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/b7403f88d3b3689e57435b75b51691a160aaeef5 - the fix itself\n- https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/a266b3958bb142bca515b3c230fdea19fbda327c - follow up, adding additional support for outdated Python versions (`3.11.9` and `3.10.11` instead of only `3.11.15` and `3.10.20`)\n- https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/releases/tag/v1.2.1",
"id": "GHSA-vh75-fwv3-pqrh",
"modified": "2026-05-13T16:26:26Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T19:52:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/security/advisories/GHSA-vh75-fwv3-pqrh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/a266b3958bb142bca515b3c230fdea19fbda327c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/commit/b7403f88d3b3689e57435b75b51691a160aaeef5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/saleor/requests-hardened/releases/tag/v1.2.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "requests-hardened is Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery"
}
GHSA-VHCQ-XC7J-XFJ8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 21:32 – Updated: 2026-09-16 21:32Metabase through 0.63.18 fails to properly validate the unspecified address 0.0.0.0 in custom GeoJSON URLs, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reach loopback services. Attackers can save a malicious GeoJSON entry with 0.0.0.0 and trigger requests that return loopback service responses to unauthenticated callers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-92813"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T21:17:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Metabase through 0.63.18 fails to properly validate the unspecified address 0.0.0.0 in custom GeoJSON URLs, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reach loopback services. Attackers can save a malicious GeoJSON entry with 0.0.0.0 and trigger requests that return loopback service responses to unauthenticated callers.",
"id": "GHSA-vhcq-xc7j-xfj8",
"modified": "2026-09-16T21:32:57Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T21:32:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92813"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/geo-chen/oss/blob/main/metabase.md#finding-2-geojson-ssrf-bypass-via-0000-address"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/metabase/metabase"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/metabase/metabase/blob/v0.61.2/src/metabase/geojson/api.clj#L26-L47"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/metabase-through-0.63.18-ssrf-via-geojson-url-validation-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHF8-CG2H-CG3P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 22:07 – Updated: 2026-07-22 22:07Impact
On an n8n instance with SSRF protection enabled, the MCP Client node sent requests to a user-supplied endpoint without routing them through that protection and without pinning the resolved address. An authenticated user who could create or edit a workflow could therefore cause the server to connect to internal or otherwise blocked hosts and read the responses back through the workflow, exposing internal services the SSRF protection was meant to protect.
Patches
The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.31.5 and 2.32.1. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations:
- Restrict n8n instance access to fully trusted users only.
- Disable the MCP Client node by adding it to the NODES_EXCLUDE environment variable.
- Restrict network egress from the n8n host to block access to internal and link-local address ranges at the network level.
These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "n8n"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.32.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.32.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "n8n"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.31.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-22T22:07:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Impact\n\nOn an n8n instance with SSRF protection enabled, the MCP Client node sent requests to a user-supplied endpoint without routing them through that protection and without pinning the resolved address. An authenticated user who could create or edit a workflow could therefore cause the server to connect to internal or otherwise blocked hosts and read the responses back through the workflow, exposing internal services the SSRF protection was meant to protect.\n\n## Patches\n\nThe issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.31.5 and 2.32.1. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nIf upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations:\n- Restrict n8n instance access to fully trusted users only.\n- Disable the MCP Client node by adding it to the `NODES_EXCLUDE` environment variable.\n- Restrict network egress from the n8n host to block access to internal and link-local address ranges at the network level.\n\nThese workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.",
"id": "GHSA-vhf8-cg2h-cg3p",
"modified": "2026-07-22T22:07:04Z",
"published": "2026-07-22T22:07:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-vhf8-cg2h-cg3p"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/commit/f69dfc6dd2178a14ea1624d2e1d403c2e755042f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/n8n@2.31.5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/releases/tag/n8n@2.32.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "n8n: SSRF Protection Bypass via MCP Client Node"
}
GHSA-VHMM-QCWG-GXPQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-01 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-01 12:31In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19422 sSRF was possible via the GitHub VCS integration
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-103497"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-01T10:17:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19422 sSRF was possible via the GitHub VCS integration",
"id": "GHSA-vhmm-qcwg-gxpq",
"modified": "2026-10-01T12:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-10-01T12:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-103497"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHP6-HRQQ-RPQJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-04 15:31 – Updated: 2024-10-04 15:31Ada.cx's Sentry configuration allowed for blind server-side request forgeries (SSRF) through the use of a data scraping endpoint.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9410"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-04T14:15:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Ada.cx\u0027s Sentry configuration allowed for blind server-side request forgeries (SSRF) through the use of a data scraping endpoint.",
"id": "GHSA-vhp6-hrqq-rpqj",
"modified": "2024-10-04T15:31:22Z",
"published": "2024-10-04T15:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9410"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2024-41"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VHV4-J9CM-5CJX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-05 18:30 – Updated: 2024-06-05 18:30A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SSRF attack on an affected system.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for specific HTTP requests that are sent to an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated to the affected device.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20404"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-05T17:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SSRF attack on an affected system.\n\n This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for specific HTTP requests that are sent to an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated to the affected device.",
"id": "GHSA-vhv4-j9cm-5cjx",
"modified": "2024-06-05T18:30:34Z",
"published": "2024-06-05T18:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20404"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-finesse-ssrf-rfi-Um7wT8Ew"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-VJ2P-7PGW-G2WF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 15:46 – Updated: 2026-03-27 15:46Impact
A successful SSRF attack allows an attacker to: - Bypass firewalls to scan and interact with internal network services/ports. - Access sensitive cloud metadata services (e.g., AWS IMDS 169.254.169.254) to potentially leak instance credentials. - Pivot into the internal network environment where Postiz is hosted.
Workarounds
There are no workarounds known to this, please upgrade to Postiz version v2.21.1.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "postiz"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2.0.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1395",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T15:46:53Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nA successful SSRF attack allows an attacker to:\n- Bypass firewalls to scan and interact with internal network services/ports.\n- Access sensitive cloud metadata services (e.g., AWS IMDS 169.254.169.254) to potentially leak instance credentials.\n- Pivot into the internal network environment where Postiz is hosted.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds known to this, please upgrade to Postiz version `v2.21.1`.",
"id": "GHSA-vj2p-7pgw-g2wf",
"modified": "2026-03-27T15:46:53Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T15:46:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app/security/advisories/GHSA-vj2p-7pgw-g2wf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-fr5h-rqp8-mj6g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-34351"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Postiz App has a High-Severity SSRF Vulnerability via Next.js"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery
An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.