CWE-918
AllowedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
6271 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-PPJH-J3RW-5X4R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-25 09:30 – Updated: 2025-01-25 09:30The Contact Form by Bit Form: Multi Step Form, Calculation Contact Form, Payment Contact Form & Custom Contact Form builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.17.4 via the Webhooks integration. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. The vulnerability can also be exploited in Multisite environments.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13450"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-25T09:15:07Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The Contact Form by Bit Form: Multi Step Form, Calculation Contact Form, Payment Contact Form \u0026 Custom Contact Form builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.17.4 via the Webhooks integration. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. The vulnerability can also be exploited in Multisite environments.",
"id": "GHSA-ppjh-j3rw-5x4r",
"modified": "2025-01-25T09:30:54Z",
"published": "2025-01-25T09:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bit-form/trunk/includes/Admin/Form/AdminFormHandler.php#L1072"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bit-form/trunk/includes/Admin/Form/AdminFormHandler.php#L1312"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bit-form/trunk/includes/Core/Integration/WebHooks/WebHooksHandler.php#L190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bit-form/trunk/includes/Core/Integration/WebHooks/WebHooksHandler.php#L51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/bit-form/trunk/includes/Core/Integration/WebHooks/WebHooksHandler.php#L96"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3227207"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/d935f4c5-5d69-42d9-be22-7a44d9aa885a?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPV4-WF78-868J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-19 12:31 – Updated: 2026-05-19 21:32Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache OFBiz via Content component operations.
This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.06.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.06, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29226"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-19T10:16:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache OFBiz via Content component operations.\n\nThis issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.06.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.06, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-ppv4-wf78-868j",
"modified": "2026-05-19T21:32:02Z",
"published": "2026-05-19T12:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/6707wys8jxzmowxggn4cmtwwk9ygl2tr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/19/16"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PPX3-28RW-8FPF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-25 15:52 – Updated: 2026-08-25 18:09Summary
The fix for CVE-2026-44661 (commit 5b16e43) added the ensure_secure_url() / is_secure_url() helpers and wired them into the three HTTP-family plugins, but it did not reach the GraphQL or WebSocket plugins. The GraphQL plugin (utcp-gql) still uses the startswith prefix check that the fix explicitly replaced, so http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example and http://localhost.evil.com pass it. The WebSocket plugin (utcp-websocket) performs no URL validation at all, even though its own docstrings state it enforces "WSS or localhost only." Both plugins reach the same SSRF that CVE-2026-44661 was filed for, and because both attach the call template's configured auth headers to the outbound connection, the SSRF can also leak API keys and OAuth tokens to an attacker-controlled host.
Details
In the CVE-2026-44661 fix (commit 5b16e43 ("fix(http): block SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url")), two things in it pointed at sibling issues. The commit message says the change is "replacing the duplicated prefix check", and the new utcp_http/_security.py docstring names the exact bug:
URLs whose hostname starts with
localhost/127.0.0.1but isn't actually loopback (e.g.http://localhost.evil.com,http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example). The earlierstartswithcheck let these through.
The word "duplicated" says the vulnerable check existed in more than one place. The fix only updated the three HTTP-family plugins (http, streamable_http, sse). The other communication-protocol plugins were also inspected.
GraphQL plugin (utcp-gql). plugins/communication_protocols/gql/src/utcp_gql/gql_communication_protocol.py still has the pre-fix check at line 43:
def _enforce_https_or_localhost(self, url: str) -> None:
if not (
url.startswith("https://")
or url.startswith("http://localhost")
or url.startswith("http://127.0.0.1")
):
raise ValueError("Security error: URL must use HTTPS or start with ...")
It is called on manual_call_template.url in register_manual (line 102) and on tool_call_template.url in call_tool (line 181). The URL then goes into AIOHTTPTransport(url=...) and a live GraphQL request.
"http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql".startswith("http://127.0.0.1") is True, so the check passes. If the attacker controls DNS for attacker.example, that hostname resolves to any address they choose, including 169.254.169.254, 127.0.0.1, or an internal 192.168.x.x host, and the GraphQL client sends a plain-HTTP request there. http://localhost.evil.com/graphql behaves the same way. This is the exact prefix bypass CVE-2026-44661 was filed for.
WebSocket plugin (utcp-websocket). plugins/communication_protocols/websocket/src/utcp_websocket/websocket_communication_protocol.py. The module and class docstrings state:
"Security enforcement (WSS or localhost only)" "Enforces security by requiring WSS or localhost connections" "Security validation of connection URLs"
There is no such validation in the code. _get_connection(), the only connection path (used by register_manual, call_tool, and call_tool_streaming), calls:
ws = await session.ws_connect(call_template.url, headers=headers, ...) # line 197
with no scheme or host check. Any URL in a WebSocketCallTemplate connects, including ws://169.254.169.254/, ws://127.0.0.1:<internal-port>/, or any internal hostname.
Credential exposure. Both plugins build connection headers in _prepare_headers(), which attaches the configured auth: ApiKeyAuth as a header, BasicAuth as an Authorization: Basic header, and OAuth2Auth as an Authorization: Bearer token. When the bypass is used to force a plain-HTTP or plain-WS connection to an attacker-resolved host, those credentials are sent to the attacker.
This is the threat model CVE-2026-44661 already established: a UTCP client ingests tool manuals, and a malicious manual is attacker-influenced. The GraphQL and WebSocket plugins consume the same kind of call template, with the same url field, at the same trust level as the HTTP plugins that were fixed.
Affected packages: utcp-gql and utcp-websocket, both at the current release 1.1.0. Neither plugin has been modified since 2025-11-30, so both are unpatched on main.
PoC
The discrepancy is directly observable. With utcp-gql and utcp-http installed:
from utcp_gql.gql_communication_protocol import GraphQLCommunicationProtocol
from utcp_http._security import is_secure_url
bypass = "http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql"
# The fixed HTTP plugin rejects the bypass URL:
print("utcp_http is_secure_url:", is_secure_url(bypass)) # -> False
# The GraphQL plugin accepts it (no exception is raised):
GraphQLCommunicationProtocol()._enforce_https_or_localhost(bypass)
print("utcp_gql _enforce_https_or_localhost: ACCEPTED")
End to end: a UTCP client that registers a manual declaring a GraphQL tool with url: "http://127.0.0.1.<attacker-domain>/graphql", where that domain resolves to an internal target, issues the request to that internal service. For WebSocket, a manual declaring a tool with url: "ws://169.254.169.254/" connects with no check at all. To confirm the request lands, point the URL at a listener you control on a host the client can reach but the attacker cannot, or at the client's own loopback.
Impact
Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918), the same class and trust boundary as CVE-2026-44661. An attacker who can get a UTCP client to register a malicious manual can:
- Make the client send GraphQL requests (GraphQL plugin) or open WebSocket connections (WebSocket plugin) to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints it would not otherwise reach.
- Force plain-HTTP / plain-WS connections to an attacker-resolved host, defeating the "HTTPS or loopback only" guarantee both plugins are meant to provide.
- Receive the call template's configured credentials (API key, Basic auth, OAuth Bearer token), because those headers are attached to the forged request.
Suggested fix. The correct helper already exists in the codebase. Promote is_secure_url / ensure_secure_url from utcp_http into a shared module (or replicate the urlparse-based hostname logic), then replace _enforce_https_or_localhost in the GraphQL plugin with it, and add an equivalent check in the WebSocket plugin's _get_connection before ws_connect, adapted for the ws and wss schemes. This is the same centralization commit 5b16e43 already applied to the three HTTP plugins; it just needs to cover the remaining two transports.
Patched
utcp-gql1.1.1 replaces the broken_enforce_https_or_localhostprefix check with hostname-basedensure_secure_url, applied at bothregister_manualandcall_tool. The underlying aiohttp session is also patched afterconnect()to refuse 3xx responses, closing the post-validation redirect SSRF on the GraphQL endpoint.utcp-websocket1.1.1 introducesensure_secure_ws_url(the WebSocket-scheme companion ofensure_secure_url) and enforces it in both theWebSocketCallTemplatePydantic field validator and_get_connection.ws_connectis called withallow_redirects=False. The OAuth2 token-fetch path uses the same redirect-safe helper introduced inutcp-http1.1.4.
Both plugins duplicate _security.py from utcp-http (rather than
adding a cross-plugin runtime dependency); keep the copies in sync
when changing validator behaviour.
Upgrade to utcp-gql >= 1.1.1 and/or utcp-websocket >= 1.1.1. No
workaround in earlier versions.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "utcp-gql"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "utcp-websocket"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12210"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-25T15:52:30Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe fix for CVE-2026-44661 (commit `5b16e43`) added the `ensure_secure_url()` / `is_secure_url()` helpers and wired them into the three HTTP-family plugins, but it did not reach the GraphQL or WebSocket plugins. The GraphQL plugin (`utcp-gql`) still uses the `startswith` prefix check that the fix explicitly replaced, so `http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example` and `http://localhost.evil.com` pass it. The WebSocket plugin (`utcp-websocket`) performs no URL validation at all, even though its own docstrings state it enforces \"WSS or localhost only.\" Both plugins reach the same SSRF that CVE-2026-44661 was filed for, and because both attach the call template\u0027s configured auth headers to the outbound connection, the SSRF can also leak API keys and OAuth tokens to an attacker-controlled host.\n\n### Details\n\nIn the CVE-2026-44661 fix (commit `5b16e43` (\"fix(http): block SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url\")), two things in it pointed at sibling issues. The commit message says the change is \"replacing the duplicated prefix check\", and the new `utcp_http/_security.py` docstring names the exact bug:\n\n\u003e URLs whose hostname *starts* with `localhost` / `127.0.0.1` but isn\u0027t actually loopback (e.g. `http://localhost.evil.com`, `http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example`). The earlier `startswith` check let these through.\n\nThe word \"duplicated\" says the vulnerable check existed in more than one place. The fix only updated the three HTTP-family plugins (`http`, `streamable_http`, `sse`). The other communication-protocol plugins were also inspected.\n\n**GraphQL plugin (`utcp-gql`).** `plugins/communication_protocols/gql/src/utcp_gql/gql_communication_protocol.py` still has the pre-fix check at line 43:\n\n```python\ndef _enforce_https_or_localhost(self, url: str) -\u003e None:\n if not (\n url.startswith(\"https://\")\n or url.startswith(\"http://localhost\")\n or url.startswith(\"http://127.0.0.1\")\n ):\n raise ValueError(\"Security error: URL must use HTTPS or start with ...\")\n```\n\nIt is called on `manual_call_template.url` in `register_manual` (line 102) and on `tool_call_template.url` in `call_tool` (line 181). The URL then goes into `AIOHTTPTransport(url=...)` and a live GraphQL request.\n\n`\"http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql\".startswith(\"http://127.0.0.1\")` is `True`, so the check passes. If the attacker controls DNS for `attacker.example`, that hostname resolves to any address they choose, including `169.254.169.254`, `127.0.0.1`, or an internal `192.168.x.x` host, and the GraphQL client sends a plain-HTTP request there. `http://localhost.evil.com/graphql` behaves the same way. This is the exact prefix bypass CVE-2026-44661 was filed for.\n\n**WebSocket plugin (`utcp-websocket`).** `plugins/communication_protocols/websocket/src/utcp_websocket/websocket_communication_protocol.py`. The module and class docstrings state:\n\n\u003e \"Security enforcement (WSS or localhost only)\"\n\u003e \"Enforces security by requiring WSS or localhost connections\"\n\u003e \"Security validation of connection URLs\"\n\nThere is no such validation in the code. `_get_connection()`, the only connection path (used by `register_manual`, `call_tool`, and `call_tool_streaming`), calls:\n\n```python\nws = await session.ws_connect(call_template.url, headers=headers, ...) # line 197\n```\n\nwith no scheme or host check. Any URL in a `WebSocketCallTemplate` connects, including `ws://169.254.169.254/`, `ws://127.0.0.1:\u003cinternal-port\u003e/`, or any internal hostname.\n\n**Credential exposure.** Both plugins build connection headers in `_prepare_headers()`, which attaches the configured auth: `ApiKeyAuth` as a header, `BasicAuth` as an `Authorization: Basic` header, and `OAuth2Auth` as an `Authorization: Bearer` token. When the bypass is used to force a plain-HTTP or plain-WS connection to an attacker-resolved host, those credentials are sent to the attacker.\n\nThis is the threat model CVE-2026-44661 already established: a UTCP client ingests tool manuals, and a malicious manual is attacker-influenced. The GraphQL and WebSocket plugins consume the same kind of call template, with the same `url` field, at the same trust level as the HTTP plugins that were fixed.\n\nAffected packages: `utcp-gql` and `utcp-websocket`, both at the current release `1.1.0`. Neither plugin has been modified since 2025-11-30, so both are unpatched on `main`.\n\n### PoC\n\nThe discrepancy is directly observable. With `utcp-gql` and `utcp-http` installed:\n\n```python\nfrom utcp_gql.gql_communication_protocol import GraphQLCommunicationProtocol\nfrom utcp_http._security import is_secure_url\n\nbypass = \"http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql\"\n\n# The fixed HTTP plugin rejects the bypass URL:\nprint(\"utcp_http is_secure_url:\", is_secure_url(bypass)) # -\u003e False\n\n# The GraphQL plugin accepts it (no exception is raised):\nGraphQLCommunicationProtocol()._enforce_https_or_localhost(bypass)\nprint(\"utcp_gql _enforce_https_or_localhost: ACCEPTED\")\n```\n\nEnd to end: a UTCP client that registers a manual declaring a GraphQL tool with `url: \"http://127.0.0.1.\u003cattacker-domain\u003e/graphql\"`, where that domain resolves to an internal target, issues the request to that internal service. For WebSocket, a manual declaring a tool with `url: \"ws://169.254.169.254/\"` connects with no check at all. To confirm the request lands, point the URL at a listener you control on a host the client can reach but the attacker cannot, or at the client\u0027s own loopback.\n\n### Impact\n\nServer-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918), the same class and trust boundary as CVE-2026-44661. An attacker who can get a UTCP client to register a malicious manual can:\n\n- Make the client send GraphQL requests (GraphQL plugin) or open WebSocket connections (WebSocket plugin) to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints it would not otherwise reach.\n- Force plain-HTTP / plain-WS connections to an attacker-resolved host, defeating the \"HTTPS or loopback only\" guarantee both plugins are meant to provide.\n- Receive the call template\u0027s configured credentials (API key, Basic auth, OAuth Bearer token), because those headers are attached to the forged request.\n\nSuggested fix. The correct helper already exists in the codebase. Promote `is_secure_url` / `ensure_secure_url` from `utcp_http` into a shared module (or replicate the `urlparse`-based hostname logic), then replace `_enforce_https_or_localhost` in the GraphQL plugin with it, and add an equivalent check in the WebSocket plugin\u0027s `_get_connection` before `ws_connect`, adapted for the `ws` and `wss` schemes. This is the same centralization commit `5b16e43` already applied to the three HTTP plugins; it just needs to cover the remaining two transports.\n\n## Patched\n\n- `utcp-gql` 1.1.1 replaces the broken `_enforce_https_or_localhost`\n prefix check with hostname-based `ensure_secure_url`, applied at\n both `register_manual` and `call_tool`. The underlying aiohttp\n session is also patched after `connect()` to refuse 3xx responses,\n closing the post-validation redirect SSRF on the GraphQL endpoint.\n- `utcp-websocket` 1.1.1 introduces `ensure_secure_ws_url` (the\n WebSocket-scheme companion of `ensure_secure_url`) and enforces it\n in both the `WebSocketCallTemplate` Pydantic field validator and\n `_get_connection`. `ws_connect` is called with `allow_redirects=False`.\n The OAuth2 token-fetch path uses the same redirect-safe helper\n introduced in `utcp-http` 1.1.4.\n\nBoth plugins duplicate `_security.py` from `utcp-http` (rather than\nadding a cross-plugin runtime dependency); keep the copies in sync\nwhen changing validator behaviour.\n\nUpgrade to `utcp-gql \u003e= 1.1.1` and/or `utcp-websocket \u003e= 1.1.1`. No\nworkaround in earlier versions.",
"id": "GHSA-ppx3-28rw-8fpf",
"modified": "2026-08-25T18:09:41Z",
"published": "2026-08-25T15:52:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp/security/advisories/GHSA-ppx3-28rw-8fpf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gola-leya/cve_submit/issues/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp/issues/86"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp/commit/fc3268e2a62e1181f91a63faf0a9bcee7639db29"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/832542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/370852"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "utcp-gql SSRF: CVE-2026-44661 fix not applied to the GraphQL and WebSocket plugins"
}
GHSA-PQ4X-338R-CQ3H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-22 09:31 – Updated: 2026-05-22 09:31The FluentCRM – Email Newsletter, Automation, Email Marketing, Email Campaigns, Optins, Leads, and CRM Solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.87 via the 'SubscribeURL' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. Exploitation requires that the SES bounce handling key ('_fc_bounce_key') has never been stored (i.e., the site is in its default/unconfigured state with respect to SES bounce handling) as visiting the bounce configuration page auto-generates and stores a random key that causes the authentication check to evaluate correctly and reject unauthenticated requests.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-7798"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-22T09:16:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The FluentCRM \u2013 Email Newsletter, Automation, Email Marketing, Email Campaigns, Optins, Leads, and CRM Solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.87 via the \u0027SubscribeURL\u0027 parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. Exploitation requires that the SES bounce handling key (\u0027_fc_bounce_key\u0027) has never been stored (i.e., the site is in its default/unconfigured state with respect to SES bounce handling) as visiting the bounce configuration page auto-generates and stores a random key that causes the authentication check to evaluate correctly and reject unauthenticated requests.",
"id": "GHSA-pq4x-338r-cq3h",
"modified": "2026-05-22T09:31:28Z",
"published": "2026-05-22T09:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/tags/2.9.87/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L113"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/tags/2.9.87/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L85"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/tags/2.9.87/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/trunk/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L113"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/trunk/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L85"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/fluent-crm/trunk/app/Hooks/Handlers/ExternalPages.php#L87"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3532271%40fluent-crm\u0026new=3532271%40fluent-crm\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5c3ca2d7-7af9-401f-bc5a-1796c6253cb0?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PQ5G-3M7V-MF66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-30 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:23The Orbit Fox by ThemeIsle WordPress plugin before 2.10.24 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a server-side request forgery as the user may force the server to access any URL of their choosing.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2287"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-30T08:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Orbit Fox by ThemeIsle WordPress plugin before 2.10.24 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a server-side request forgery as the user may force the server to access any URL of their choosing.",
"id": "GHSA-pq5g-3m7v-mf66",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:23:15Z",
"published": "2023-05-30T09:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2287"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/1b36a184-2138-4a65-8940-07e7764669bb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PQ8J-3W2F-7PCX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:07 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:07An SSRF vulnerability in the "Upload from URL" feature in Elements-IT HTTP Commander 5.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to retrieve HTTP and FTP files from the internal server network by inserting an internal address.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-33213"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-14T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An SSRF vulnerability in the \"Upload from URL\" feature in Elements-IT HTTP Commander 5.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to retrieve HTTP and FTP files from the internal server network by inserting an internal address.",
"id": "GHSA-pq8j-3w2f-7pcx",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:07:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:07:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-33213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2021-027.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.syss.de/pentest-blog"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-PQCC-2W78-J9FQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-05 00:30 – Updated: 2025-08-05 00:30A vulnerability classified as critical was found in cloudfavorites favorites-web up to 1.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getCollectLogoUrl of the file app/src/main/java/com/favorites/web/CollectController.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8529"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-04T23:15:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as critical was found in cloudfavorites favorites-web up to 1.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getCollectLogoUrl of the file app/src/main/java/com/favorites/web/CollectController.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-pqcc-2w78-j9fq",
"modified": "2025-08-05T00:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-08-05T00:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8529"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudfavorites/favorites-web/issues/134"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudfavorites/favorites-web/issues/134#issue-3252105130"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.318655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.318655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.622176"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-PQH3-8X4P-M5M8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-03 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-03 18:30A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20332"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-03T17:15:48Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device.\n\n This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-pqh3-8x4p-m5m8",
"modified": "2024-04-03T18:30:41Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T18:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20332"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ise-ssrf-FtSTh5Oz"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-PQHR-MP3F-HRPP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-31 23:26 – Updated: 2026-03-31 23:26Product: Nuxt OG Image Version: < 6.2.5 CWE-ID: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery
Description
The image generation endpoint (/_og/d/) accepts user-controlled parameters that are passed to the server-side renderer without proper validation or filtering. An attacker can trigger server-side requests to internal network addresses through multiple vectors.
Impact
- Scanning internal ports and services inaccessible from the outside
- Reading sensitive data from cloud infrastructure metadata services (tokens, credentials) when verbose error output is enabled
Attack Vectors
Three distinct vectors were identified, all exploiting the same underlying lack of URL validation:
Vector 1: CSS background-image injection via style parameter
GET /_og/d/og.png?style=background-image:+url('http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret')
Vector 2: <img src> injection via html parameter
GET /_og/d/og.png?html=<img src="http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret">
When verbose errors are enabled, the response content is leaked in base64-encoded error messages.
Vector 3: SVG <image href> injection via html parameter
GET /_og/d/og.png?html=<svg><image href="http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret"></svg>
Mitigation
Fixed in v6.2.5. The image source plugin now blocks requests to private IP ranges (IPv4/IPv6), loopback addresses, link-local addresses, and cloud metadata endpoints. Decimal/hexadecimal IP encoding bypasses are also handled.
Credits
Researcher: Dmitry Prokhorov (Positive Technologies)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "nuxt-og-image"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.2.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-31T23:26:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "**Product:** Nuxt OG Image\n**Version:** \u003c 6.2.5\n**CWE-ID:** [CWE-918](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html): Server-Side Request Forgery\n\n## Description\n\nThe image generation endpoint (`/_og/d/`) accepts user-controlled parameters that are passed to the server-side renderer without proper validation or filtering. An attacker can trigger server-side requests to internal network addresses through multiple vectors.\n\n## Impact\n\n- Scanning internal ports and services inaccessible from the outside\n- Reading sensitive data from cloud infrastructure metadata services (tokens, credentials) when verbose error output is enabled\n\n## Attack Vectors\n\nThree distinct vectors were identified, all exploiting the same underlying lack of URL validation:\n\n### Vector 1: CSS `background-image` injection via `style` parameter\n\n```\nGET /_og/d/og.png?style=background-image:+url(\u0027http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret\u0027)\n```\n\n### Vector 2: `\u003cimg src\u003e` injection via `html` parameter\n\n```\nGET /_og/d/og.png?html=\u003cimg src=\"http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret\"\u003e\n```\n\nWhen verbose errors are enabled, the response content is leaked in base64-encoded error messages.\n\n### Vector 3: SVG `\u003cimage href\u003e` injection via `html` parameter\n\n```\nGET /_og/d/og.png?html=\u003csvg\u003e\u003cimage href=\"http://127.0.0.1:8888/secret\"\u003e\u003c/svg\u003e\n```\n\n## Mitigation\n\nFixed in v6.2.5. The image source plugin now blocks requests to private IP ranges (IPv4/IPv6), loopback addresses, link-local addresses, and cloud metadata endpoints. Decimal/hexadecimal IP encoding bypasses are also handled.\n\n## Credits\n\nResearcher: Dmitry Prokhorov (Positive Technologies)",
"id": "GHSA-pqhr-mp3f-hrpp",
"modified": "2026-03-31T23:26:29Z",
"published": "2026-03-31T23:26:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nuxt-modules/og-image/security/advisories/GHSA-pqhr-mp3f-hrpp"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nuxt-modules/og-image"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Nuxt OG Image vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via user-controlled parameters"
}
GHSA-PQM3-3JPC-6F48
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 15:31 – Updated: 2026-07-22 15:31In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, insufficient validation of content submitted to the RadEditor PDF export feature may allow an authenticated attacker to trigger server-side requests to arbitrary hosts, resulting in outbound network connections and potential exposure of Windows authentication credentials.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-13192"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-22T14:17:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In Progress\u00ae Telerik\u00ae UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, insufficient validation of content submitted to the RadEditor PDF export feature may allow an authenticated attacker to trigger server-side requests to arbitrary hosts, resulting in outbound network connections and potential exposure of Windows authentication credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-pqm3-3jpc-6f48",
"modified": "2026-07-22T15:31:23Z",
"published": "2026-07-22T15:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-13192"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.telerik.com/products/aspnet-ajax/documentation/knowledge-base/kb-security-radeditor-pdf-export-ssrf-CVE-2026-13192"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery
An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.