Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-89
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
29324 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-82028 (GCVE-0-2026-82028)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 19:56 – Updated: 2026-09-26 13:29 X_Open Source
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Magistrala < 1.0.0 SQL Injection via format Parameter in Reader API
Summary
Magistrala before 1.0.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the timescale-reader and postgres-reader HTTP API services that allows authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL by supplying a malicious format query parameter that is interpolated directly into the FROM clause without parameterization or identifier quoting. Attackers with a self-registered account can substitute arbitrary subqueries to achieve cross-tenant database reads, extract pg_shadow password hashes, read and write arbitrary files, and execute arbitrary code as the postgres OS user by loading attacker-supplied shared objects, with all injected SQL executing at superuser privilege due to the default PostgreSQL role configuration.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-16 16:11 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/releases/ta… | release-notes |
| https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/pull/3581 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/pull/3581/c… | patch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/magistrala-s… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| absmach | magistrala |
Affected:
0 , < 1.0.0
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-08-13 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82028",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-16T16:11:24.801669Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T16:11:39.543Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/absmach/magistrala",
"product": "magistrala",
"repo": "https://github.com/absmach/magistrala",
"vendor": "absmach",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Haseeb(^hxm)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulnCheck"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Magistrala before 1.0.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the timescale-reader and postgres-reader HTTP API services that allows authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL by supplying a malicious format query parameter that is interpolated directly into the FROM clause without parameterization or identifier quoting. Attackers with a self-registered account can substitute arbitrary subqueries to achieve cross-tenant database reads, extract pg_shadow password hashes, read and write arbitrary files, and execute arbitrary code as the postgres OS user by loading attacker-supplied shared objects, with all injected SQL executing at superuser privilege due to the default PostgreSQL role configuration."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-26T13:29:55.933Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Magistrala v1.0.0 Release Notes",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/releases/tag/v1.0.0"
},
{
"name": "Pull Request",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/pull/3581"
},
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/absmach/magistrala/pull/3581/changes/aac9461aa561c3de7aa9a0dc814ac84c602e0cf9"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/magistrala-sql-injection-via-format-parameter-in-reader-api"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "Magistrala \u003c 1.0.0 SQL Injection via format Parameter in Reader API",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82028",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T19:56:59.881Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T21:39:20.459Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-26T13:29:55.933Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-82011 (GCVE-0-2026-82011)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 17:39 – Updated: 2026-09-23 14:38
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Summary
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 18:35 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaig… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | Adobe Campaign Classic |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 7.4.4 build 9401
(custom)
Unaffected: 7.4.4 build 9402 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-09-08 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82011",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T18:35:55.432249Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T14:38:35.564Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Adobe Campaign Classic",
"vendor": "Adobe",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.4 build 9401",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.4.4 build 9402",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-08T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"environmentalScore": 9.1,
"environmentalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitCodeMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "LOW",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NETWORK",
"modifiedAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"modifiedConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "LOW",
"modifiedScope": "CHANGED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"remediationLevel": "NOT_DEFINED",
"reportConfidence": "NOT_DEFINED",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"temporalScore": 9.1,
"temporalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T17:39:53.998Z",
"orgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"shortName": "adobe"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-142.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"assignerShortName": "adobe",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82011",
"datePublished": "2026-09-22T17:39:53.998Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T21:20:45.369Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T14:38:35.564Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-82010 (GCVE-0-2026-82010)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 17:39 – Updated: 2026-09-22 18:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Summary
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Severity
9.9 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 18:30 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaig… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | Adobe Campaign Classic |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 7.4.4 build 9401
(custom)
Unaffected: 7.4.4 build 9402 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-09-08 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82010",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T18:30:00.705245Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:31:50.848Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Adobe Campaign Classic",
"vendor": "Adobe",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.4 build 9401",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.4.4 build 9402",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-08T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"environmentalScore": 10,
"environmentalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitCodeMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "LOW",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NETWORK",
"modifiedAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "LOW",
"modifiedScope": "CHANGED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"remediationLevel": "NOT_DEFINED",
"reportConfidence": "NOT_DEFINED",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"temporalScore": 9.9,
"temporalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T17:39:50.463Z",
"orgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"shortName": "adobe"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-142.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"assignerShortName": "adobe",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82010",
"datePublished": "2026-09-22T17:39:50.463Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T21:20:45.369Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:31:50.848Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-82009 (GCVE-0-2026-82009)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-22 17:40 – Updated: 2026-09-25 23:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Summary
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-25 23:51 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaig… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | Adobe Campaign Classic |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 7.4.4 build 9401
(custom)
Unaffected: 7.4.4 build 9402 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-09-08 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82009",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-25T23:51:32.406683Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T23:51:41.499Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Adobe Campaign Classic",
"vendor": "Adobe",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.4 build 9401",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.4.4 build 9402",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-08T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"environmentalScore": 9.1,
"environmentalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitCodeMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "LOW",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NETWORK",
"modifiedAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"modifiedScope": "CHANGED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"remediationLevel": "NOT_DEFINED",
"reportConfidence": "NOT_DEFINED",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"temporalScore": 9.1,
"temporalSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T17:40:00.116Z",
"orgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"shortName": "adobe"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-142.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) (CWE-89)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"assignerShortName": "adobe",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82009",
"datePublished": "2026-09-22T17:40:00.116Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T21:20:45.368Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T23:51:41.499Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81933 (GCVE-0-2026-81933)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-18 19:28 – Updated: 2026-09-23 03:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.
Summary
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the analytic cases grid endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Guardium Data Protection |
Affected:
12.2
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:12.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81933",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T03:55:45.603Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:12.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Guardium Data Protection",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the analytic cases grid endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the analytic cases grid endpoint, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-18T19:28:48.729Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM encourages customers to update their systems promptly.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u00a0Product\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVersions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u00a0Fix\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eIBM Guardium Data Protection\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12.2\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=IBM%20Security\u0026amp;product=ibm/Information+Management/InfoSphere+Guardium\u0026amp;release=12.2\u0026amp;platform=Linux\u0026amp;function=fixId\u0026amp;fixids=SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack\u0026amp;includeSupersedes=0\u0026amp;source=fc\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=IBM%20Security\u0026amp;product=ibm/Information+Management/InfoSphere+Guardium\u0026amp;release=12.2\u0026amp;platform=Linux\u0026amp;function=fixId\u0026amp;fixids=SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack\u0026amp;includeSupersedes=0\u0026amp;source=fc\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM encourages customers to update their systems promptly.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0ProductVersions\u00a0FixIBM Guardium Data Protection12.2 https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=IBM%20Security\u0026product=ibm/Information+Management/InfoSphere+Guardium\u0026release=12.2\u0026platform=Linux\u0026function=fixId\u0026fixids=SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack\u0026includeSupersedes=0\u0026source=fc"
}
],
"title": "IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities."
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81933",
"datePublished": "2026-09-18T19:28:48.729Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T19:03:10.745Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T03:55:45.603Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81895 (GCVE-0-2026-81895)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 16:39 – Updated: 2026-09-22 18:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to Stored SQL Injection in Concrete CMS Document Library Block via `fsID[]` in `setMode=any`
Summary
In Concrete CMS before 9.5.3, the Document Library block stored the file-set identifiers submitted through fsID[] without validating them as integers, and when the block was configured with setMode set to any it concatenated each stored identifier directly into the file-set filter query instead of casting it or binding it as a parameter. An authenticated user permitted to add or edit a Document Library block could therefore persist SQL syntax in the block configuration (btDocumentLibrary.setIds), and that stored expression was executed every time the published page containing the block was rendered, producing stored, time-based blind SQL injection. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Habib Allah for reporting.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 18:09 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/… | release-notes |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete CMS | Concrete CMS |
Affected:
5.0.0 , ≤ 9.5.2
(git)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81895",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T18:09:21.446408Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:09:47.853Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Concrete CMS",
"repo": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms",
"vendor": "Concrete CMS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.5.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "4raqiblade"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIn Concrete CMS before 9.5.3, the Document Library block stored the file-set identifiers submitted through fsID[] without validating them as integers, and when the block was configured with setMode set to any it concatenated each stored identifier directly into the file-set filter query instead of casting it or binding it as a parameter. An authenticated user permitted to add or edit a Document Library block could therefore persist SQL syntax in the block configuration (btDocumentLibrary.setIds), and that stored expression was executed every time the published page containing the block was rendered, producing stored, time-based blind SQL injection.\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Habib Allah for reporting.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Concrete CMS before 9.5.3, the Document Library block stored the file-set identifiers submitted through fsID[] without validating them as integers, and when the block was configured with setMode set to any it concatenated each stored identifier directly into the file-set filter query instead of casting it or binding it as a parameter. An authenticated user permitted to add or edit a Document Library block could therefore persist SQL syntax in the block configuration (btDocumentLibrary.setIds), and that stored expression was executed every time the published page containing the block was rendered, producing stored, time-based blind SQL injection.\u00a0The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Habib Allah for reporting."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-66",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-66 SQL Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command (\u0027SQL injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T16:39:04.519Z",
"orgId": "ff5b8ace-8b95-4078-9743-eac1ca5451de",
"shortName": "ConcreteCMS"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/introduction/version-history/953-release-notes"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "3888596",
"defect": [
"HackerOne"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to Stored SQL Injection in Concrete CMS Document Library Block via `fsID[]` in `setMode=any`",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ff5b8ace-8b95-4078-9743-eac1ca5451de",
"assignerShortName": "ConcreteCMS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81895",
"datePublished": "2026-09-15T16:39:04.519Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T18:18:39.737Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:09:47.853Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81894 (GCVE-0-2026-81894)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 16:35 – Updated: 2026-09-22 18:07
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to Stored DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in the Gallery block image Caption field
Summary
Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to stored DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the Gallery block's per-image Caption field because the bundled Magnific Popup lightbox script (concrete/js/features/imagery/frontend.js) re-parses the attribute-decoded caption as HTML through jQuery's .append() in titleSrc instead of inserting it as text. A user with permission to edit a page containing a Gallery block can store a caption that executes in the browser of any visitor who opens that image's lightbox. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-22 18:05 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/… | release-notes |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete CMS | Concrete CMS |
Affected:
5.0.0 , ≤ 9.5.2
(git)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81894",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-22T18:05:47.459277Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:07:28.458Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Concrete CMS",
"repo": "https://github.com/concretecms/concretecms",
"vendor": "Concrete CMS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.5.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "tenzai"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eConcrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to stored DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the Gallery block\u0027s per-image Caption field because the bundled Magnific Popup lightbox script (concrete/js/features/imagery/frontend.js) re-parses the attribute-decoded caption as HTML through jQuery\u0027s .append() in titleSrc instead of inserting it as text. A user with permission to edit a page containing a Gallery block can store a caption that executes in the browser of any visitor who opens that image\u0027s lightbox. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to stored DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the Gallery block\u0027s per-image Caption field because the bundled Magnific Popup lightbox script (concrete/js/features/imagery/frontend.js) re-parses the attribute-decoded caption as HTML through jQuery\u0027s .append() in titleSrc instead of inserting it as text. A user with permission to edit a page containing a Gallery block can store a caption that executes in the browser of any visitor who opens that image\u0027s lightbox. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 8.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-66",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-66 SQL Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command (\u0027SQL injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T16:35:37.767Z",
"orgId": "ff5b8ace-8b95-4078-9743-eac1ca5451de",
"shortName": "ConcreteCMS"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/introduction/version-history/953-release-notes"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "3908272",
"defect": [
"HackerOne"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Concrete CMS 9.5.2 and below is vulnerable to Stored DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in the Gallery block image Caption field",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ff5b8ace-8b95-4078-9743-eac1ca5451de",
"assignerShortName": "ConcreteCMS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81894",
"datePublished": "2026-09-15T16:35:37.767Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T18:18:39.736Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-22T18:07:28.458Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81800 (GCVE-0-2026-81800)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-10 14:23 – Updated: 2026-09-11 20:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
WordPress Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) plugin <= 2.4.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability
Summary
Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) <= 2.4.6 versions.
Severity
9.3 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-11 20:11 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/… | vdb-entry |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Par avisverifies | Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) |
Affected:
n/a , ≤ 2.4.6
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81800",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-11T20:11:56.736861Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T20:19:13.077Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "netreviews",
"product": "Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s)",
"vendor": "Par avisverifies",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Mael MARTIN, Othmane EL AYADI | Patchstack Bug Bounty Program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) \u003c= 2.4.6 versions."
}
],
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) \u003c= 2.4.6 versions."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-7",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-7 Blind SQL Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-10T14:23:47.971Z",
"orgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"shortName": "Patchstack"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/netreviews/vulnerability/wordpress-verified-reviews-avis-verifies-plugin-2-4-6-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "WordPress Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) plugin \u003c= 2.4.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"assignerShortName": "Patchstack",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81800",
"datePublished": "2026-09-10T14:23:47.971Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T12:24:38.075Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-11T20:19:13.077Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81763 (GCVE-0-2026-81763)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-31 20:30 – Updated: 2026-09-01 18:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
WordPress Throws SPAM Away plugin <= 3.8.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability
Summary
Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Throws SPAM Away <= 3.8.2 versions.
Severity
9.3 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-01 18:12 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/… | vdb-entry |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ウェブ屋のさとーさん | Throws SPAM Away |
Affected:
n/a , ≤ 3.8.2
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81763",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-01T18:12:17.130431Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T18:12:24.672Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "throws-spam-away",
"product": "Throws SPAM Away",
"vendor": "\u30a6\u30a7\u30d6\u5c4b\u306e\u3055\u3068\u30fc\u3055\u3093",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "3.9",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.8.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Jiemook | Patchstack Bug Bounty Program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Throws SPAM Away \u003c= 3.8.2 versions."
}
],
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Throws SPAM Away \u003c= 3.8.2 versions."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-7",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-7 Blind SQL Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T20:30:49.036Z",
"orgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"shortName": "Patchstack"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/throws-spam-away/vulnerability/wordpress-throws-spam-away-plugin-3-8-2-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update the WordPress Throws SPAM Away Plugin to the latest available version (at least 3.9)."
}
],
"value": "Update the WordPress Throws SPAM Away Plugin to the latest available version (at least 3.9)."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "WordPress Throws SPAM Away plugin \u003c= 3.8.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"assignerShortName": "Patchstack",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81763",
"datePublished": "2026-08-31T20:30:49.036Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T12:22:09.413Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-01T18:12:24.672Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-81756 (GCVE-0-2026-81756)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-31 20:30 – Updated: 2026-09-02 14:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
WordPress Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms plugin <= 5.1.24 - SQL Injection vulnerability
Summary
Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms <= 5.1.24 versions.
Severity
9.3 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-02 14:17 UTC
CWE
- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/… | vdb-entry |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autorius E-goi | Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms |
Affected:
n/a , ≤ 5.1.24
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-81756",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-02T14:17:44.170453Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-02T14:19:08.224Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "smart-marketing-for-wp",
"product": "Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms",
"vendor": "Autorius E-goi",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "5.1.25",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.1.24",
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Supakiad S. (m3ez) | Patchstack Bug Bounty Program"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms \u003c= 5.1.24 versions."
}
],
"value": "Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms \u003c= 5.1.24 versions."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-7",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-7 Blind SQL Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T20:30:47.073Z",
"orgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"shortName": "Patchstack"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/smart-marketing-for-wp/vulnerability/wordpress-smart-marketing-sms-and-newsletters-forms-plugin-5-1-24-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update the WordPress Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms Plugin to the latest available version (at least 5.1.25)."
}
],
"value": "Update the WordPress Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms Plugin to the latest available version (at least 5.1.25)."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "WordPress Smart Marketing SMS and Newsletters Forms plugin \u003c= 5.1.24 - SQL Injection vulnerability",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
"assignerShortName": "Patchstack",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-81756",
"datePublished": "2026-08-31T20:30:47.073Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-27T12:22:09.412Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-02T14:19:08.224Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedures. These features should accept parameters or variables and support strong typing. Do not dynamically construct and execute query strings within these features using "exec" or similar functionality, since this may re-introduce the possibility of SQL injection. [REF-867]
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
- Specifically, follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. The database users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account. If the requirements of the system indicate that a user can read and modify their own data, then limit their privileges so they cannot read/write others' data. Use the strictest permissions possible on all database objects, such as execute-only for stored procedures.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
- Instead of building a new implementation, such features may be available in the database or programming language. For example, the Oracle DBMS_ASSERT package can check or enforce that parameters have certain properties that make them less vulnerable to SQL injection. For MySQL, the mysql_real_escape_string() API function is available in both C and PHP.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing SQL query strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing SQL injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent SQL injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, the name "O'Reilly" would likely pass the validation step, since it is a common last name in the English language. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the database because it contains the "'" apostrophe character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the apostrophe might reduce the risk of SQL injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the wrong name would be recorded.
- When feasible, it may be safest to disallow meta-characters entirely, instead of escaping them. This will provide some defense in depth. After the data is entered into the database, later processes may neglect to escape meta-characters before use, and you may not have control over those processes.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of SQL Injection, error messages revealing the structure of a SQL query can help attackers tailor successful attack strings.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-109: Object Relational Mapping Injection
An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject their own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
CAPEC-110: SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
CAPEC-470: Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database
An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
CAPEC-66: SQL Injection
This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input.
CAPEC-7: Blind SQL Injection
Blind SQL Injection results from an insufficient mitigation for SQL Injection. Although suppressing database error messages are considered best practice, the suppression alone is not sufficient to prevent SQL Injection. Blind SQL Injection is a form of SQL Injection that overcomes the lack of error messages. Without the error messages that facilitate SQL Injection, the adversary constructs input strings that probe the target through simple Boolean SQL expressions. The adversary can determine if the syntax and structure of the injection was successful based on whether the query was executed or not. Applied iteratively, the adversary determines how and where the target is vulnerable to SQL Injection.